Genetically predicted testosterone and systemic inflammation in men: a separate-sample Mendelian randomization analysis in older Chinese men

PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0126442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126442. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objectives: Observationally, testosterone is negatively associated with systemic inflammation, but this association is open to both residual confounding and reverse causality. Large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessing exogenous effects, are presently unavailable. We examined the association of endogenous testosterone with well-established systemic inflammatory markers (white blood cell, granulocyte, lymphocyte and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)) using a separate-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to minimize reverse causality.

Methods: A genetic prediction rule for serum testosterone was developed in 289 young Chinese men with mean age of 21.0, using selected testosterone-related SNPs (rs10046, rs1008805 and rs1256031). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association of genetically predicted serum testosterone with inflammatory markers among 4,212 older Chinese men from the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.

Results: Genetically predicted testosterone was unrelated to white blood cell count (-0.01 109/L per nmol/L testosterone, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05 to 0.04), granulocyte count (-0.02 109/L, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.02), lymphocyte count (0.005 109/L, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02) and hsCRP (-0.05 mg/L, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.06).

Conclusion: Our findings did not corroborate any anti-inflammatory effects of testosterone or corresponding potentially protective effects of testosterone on chronic diseases resulting from reduced low-grade systemic inflammation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • China
  • Humans
  • Inflammation / metabolism*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Testosterone / analysis*

Substances

  • Testosterone

Grants and funding

The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study was funded by the University of Hong Kong Foundation for Development and Research (Hong Kong, China); the University of Hong Kong University Research Committee Strategic Research Theme of Public Health (Hong Kong, China); Guangzhou Public Health Bureau (Guangzhou, China; Key technology collaboration project, grant number 2012J5100041), Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Guangzhou, China) and the University of Birmingham (Birmingham, United Kingdom). This sub-study was funded by the Research Grant Council General Research Fund (grant number 769710), Research Grant Council of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.