A large-scale field study examining effects of exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola on honey bee colony health, development, and overwintering success

PeerJ. 2014 Oct 30:2:e652. doi: 10.7717/peerj.652. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

In summer 2012, we initiated a large-scale field experiment in southern Ontario, Canada, to determine whether exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola (oil seed rape) has any adverse impacts on honey bees. Colonies were placed in clothianidin seed-treated or control canola fields during bloom, and thereafter were moved to an apiary with no surrounding crops grown from seeds treated with neonicotinoids. Colony weight gain, honey production, pest incidence, bee mortality, number of adults, and amount of sealed brood were assessed in each colony throughout summer and autumn. Samples of honey, beeswax, pollen, and nectar were regularly collected, and samples were analyzed for clothianidin residues. Several of these endpoints were also measured in spring 2013. Overall, colonies were vigorous during and after the exposure period, and we found no effects of exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola on any endpoint measures. Bees foraged heavily on the test fields during peak bloom and residue analysis indicated that honey bees were exposed to low levels (0.5-2 ppb) of clothianidin in pollen. Low levels of clothianidin were detected in a few pollen samples collected toward the end of the bloom from control hives, illustrating the difficulty of conducting a perfectly controlled field study with free-ranging honey bees in agricultural landscapes. Overwintering success did not differ significantly between treatment and control hives, and was similar to overwintering colony loss rates reported for the winter of 2012-2013 for beekeepers in Ontario and Canada. Our results suggest that exposure to canola grown from seed treated with clothianidin poses low risk to honey bees.

Keywords: Canola; Clothianidin; Honey bees; Neonicotinoid; Pollinators; Seed-treatment.

Grants and funding

Funding of all expenses for this study was through Bayer CropScience. Bayer CropScience personnel had no role in collecting or interpreting field and honey bee colony data, or in writing the manuscript. Bayer CropScience employed MS and ADM as summer students, and LB as the GLP Study Director for this study. Bayer CropScience personnel assisted in treating seeds, establishing field sites, and conducting residue analysis of back-up pollen samples. GCC and CDS-D received no financial payment, research grants, travel grants, honoraria, or gifts of any kind in conducting this research or writing the manuscript. In addition to GCC, CDS-D, and LB, personnel from Bayer CropScience, the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency had input into the experimental design. During an ‘open tour’ of the experimental sites, members of the beekeeping community and provincial honey bee specialists also provided suggestions that were incorporated into the study design.