Three-dimensional elastography for cervical lymph node volume measurements: a study to investigate feasibility, accuracy and reliability

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Mar;39(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.10.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

This study investigated the feasibility of using three-dimensional (3-D) elastography in measuring cervical lymph node volume and compared the accuracy and reliability of 3-D elastography and 3-D grayscale ultrasound in measurement of ill-defined cervical nodes. Eighteen porcine lymph nodes from the neck were embedded in tissue-mimicking phantoms and scanned with the two ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound measurements were compared with the volume determined by water-displacement method to evaluate measurement accuracy. Inter-observer reproducibility and intra-observer repeatability of measurements were evaluated. Four patients with enlarged neck nodes were included to evaluate intra-observer repeatability of ultrasound measurements. Results demonstrated that lymph nodes that appeared ill-defined on grayscale ultrasound showed well-defined boundaries on elastography. 3-D elastography has higher measurement accuracy (84.2%), reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.909) and repeatability (ICC = 0.964-0.988) than does 3-D grayscale ultrasound (62.2%, 0.777 and 0.863-0.906 respectively). As a conclusion, 3-D elastography is accurate and reliable in volume measurement of ill-defined lymph nodes and has potential for accurate assessment of lymph node volume.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Elasticity Imaging Techniques / methods*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Lymph Nodes / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology*
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Neck / diagnostic imaging
  • Neck / pathology
  • Observer Variation
  • Organ Size
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Swine