Quantitative analysis of four rapid antigen assays for detection of pandemic H1N1 2009 compared with seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 influenza A viruses on nasopharyngeal aspirates from patients with influenza

J Virol Methods. 2012 Dec;186(1-2):184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

Data on analytical sensitivity of rapid diagnostic assays are important for clinical management of influenza, especially during a pandemic. Four rapid antigen detection assays were compared for detection of pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009, seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 in 96 patients with influenza A infection confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. These rapid antigen tests appeared to have lower sensitivity (55.8%) for the diagnosis of pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 as compared with seasonal H3N2 (71.0%) or H1N1 (69.4%) influenza infections, a difference that was related to a lower viral load in patients infected with the pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 virus. The detection limit of these antigen detection tests in clinical specimens was an influenza A M gene copy number of average 1.0×10(7) copies/ml. Significant variations between tests in sensitivity for detection of pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 (43.4-63.3%) were observed. The Directigen EZ Influenza A+B and the Espline Influenza A+B had comparable sensitivity (63%) and were the most sensitive among the four assays evaluated.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antigens, Viral / analysis*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods
  • Infant
  • Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype / isolation & purification*
  • Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype / isolation & purification*
  • Influenza, Human / virology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasopharynx / virology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Virology / methods*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antigens, Viral