The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized-controlled clinical trial

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):14-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

Abstract

Objective: to compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue-level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.

Material and methods: eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri-apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type-evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading.

Results: the mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1-2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading.

Conclusion: implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Alveolar Bone Loss / diagnostic imaging
  • Alveolar Bone Loss / etiology
  • Alveolar Bone Loss / prevention & control*
  • Bone Density
  • Bone Regeneration*
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / adverse effects
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Peri-Implantitis / prevention & control
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / prevention & control
  • Radiography
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing

Substances

  • Dental Implants