Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a randomized controlled trial comparing skeletal stability

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.030. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the skeletal stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO) for moderate mandibular advancement.

Study design: Fourteen class II mandibular hypoplasia patients requiring mandibular advancement between 6 and 10 mm were randomized into 2 groups for either BSSO or MDO. Serial lateral cephalographs were taken 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery for the assessment of skeletal stability. The Student t test was used to analyze stability with statistical significance set at P < .05.

Results: There was no significant difference (P > .05) in horizontal and vertical skeletal relapse between the 2 groups at every postoperative time period.

Conclusions: Although the MDO group reported less horizontal and vertical skeletal relapse for mandibular advancements between 6 and 10 mm at 1 year, no statistically significance was found between the groups. Other patient-related factors need to be considered when choosing one technique over the other.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cephalometry
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II / surgery*
  • Mandible / abnormalities
  • Mandible / surgery*
  • Mandibular Advancement / methods*
  • Micrognathism / surgery
  • Osteogenesis, Distraction*
  • Osteotomy
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Young Adult