The purpose of the present study was to compare the diagnostic properties of radiographs obtained with Ultra-Speed and Ektaspeed films when analyzed conventionally radiographs and after conversion in digital subtraction images. Artificial lesions, measuring 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.1 mm in diameter, were drilled in a dry skull with slow-speed burs. Standardized radiographs were obtained by means of acrylic bite blocks and a modification of the Rinn system. The results of this study demonstrated that sensitivity in the detection of the lesions was doubled after digitizing and displaying subtraction images compared with the conventional radiographic interpretation, independent of the use of Ektaspeed or Ultra-Speed films for the original radiographs. The diagnostic information seemed to be equal in radiographs obtained from Ultra-Speed and Ektaspeed films after digitization and image processing procedures.