Background: The identification of causative microoganisms in severe pneumonias is a usually difficult problem. Protected brushing (PB) has a good specificity but a limited sensitivity. Conventional bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL-C) has an excellent sensitivity but a doubtful specificity. The investigation of a new technique such as the protected bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL-P) appears as logical, as it should combine the advantages of PB and BAL-C without their drawbacks.
Methods: In 15 patients without bacterial or fungal infections and in 23 with bacterial or fungal pneumonia, quantitative cultures were carried out in the samples obtained with PB, BAL-P and BAL-C. PB and BAL-C were performed with the usual technique. BAL-P was performed through the internal catheter of a telescoped double catheter with reabsorbable distal cap within the fibroscope channel. 40 ml of saline were instillated for the lavage.
Results: With BAL-P sensitivity was 95% and specificity 89%. These were, respectively, 55% and 94% with PB, and 95% and 42% with BAL-C. The technique of BAL-P was more complex an longer than that of PB.
Conclusions: If these results are confirmed in further studies, BAL-P might become a method of choice for the bacterial pneumonias where now PB is indicated. However, in patients with hypersecretion or when bronchoscopy should be rapidly carried out, PB is technically more feasible.