Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass in the management of morbid obesity: a 7-year retrospective study of 1,364 patients from a single center

Obes Surg. 2008 Nov;18(11):1359-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9455-5. Epub 2008 Apr 26.

Abstract

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,364 consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent restrictive-malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) between January 1998 and December 2004. A selective use of open and laparoscopic approaches was employed since 2001. Patients were seen in the office at 1 week; 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months; and yearly thereafter. During visits, each patient was weighed and dietary intake and exercise regimen were recorded.

Results: We report a sustained weight reduction in over 90% of patients. The anastomotic leak rate was 0.15%, the 30-day readmission rate was 1.17%, and the overall mortality rate was 0.15%. Minor surgical site infection rate was 0.5%, and revision to long limb RYGBP rate was 0.07%.

Conclusions: Morbid obesity represents a significant health issue. None of the medical methods of weight reduction provide a lasting weight reduction. Surgery offers the only achievable long-term solution. Although not yet universally employed, laparoscopic RYGBP is rapidly becoming the standard operation for the surgical treatment of clinically severe obesity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Gastric Bypass / methods*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Male
  • Obesity, Morbid / surgery
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome