Radiosurgery versus carbon dioxide laser for dermatochalasis correction in Asians

Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):176-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20384.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser and radiosurgery are techniques commonly employed in oculoplastic surgery. However, there is no literature comparing their results in blepharoplasty.

Study design/materials and methods: Twenty Chinese patients with dermatochalasis underwent radiosurgery in one upper eyelid and CO(2) laser in the contralateral eyelid. Intraoperative time, hemorrhage, and pain control were assessed. Subjects were evaluated at postoperative 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months for hemorrhage and wound healing by a masked assessor.

Results: All patients reported minimal pain with either technique. A significantly shorter operative time was achieved with CO(2) laser, with better intraoperative hemostasis. There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage and wound swelling between radiosurgery and CO(2) laser. No significant intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusions: Both radiosurgery and CO(2) laser are equally safe and effective for upper lid blepharoplasty. CO(2) laser achieves shorter operative time with superior intraoperative hemostasis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Asian People*
  • Blepharoplasty / instrumentation*
  • Carbon Dioxide*
  • Cutis Laxa / radiotherapy*
  • Cutis Laxa / surgery*
  • Eyelid Diseases / radiotherapy*
  • Eyelid Diseases / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiosurgery*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide