Comparison of the Berman Intubating Airway and the Williams Airway Intubator for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients

Anaesthesia. 2006 Jul;61(7):678-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04704.x.

Abstract

Sixty patients with no clinical indicators of a difficult airway were selected to undergo a fibreoptic assessment after induction of general anaesthesia using both the Berman Intubating Airway and the Williams Airway Intubator. The bronchoscopic view and ease of railroading a tracheal tube during fibreoptic orotracheal intubation were studied. The bronchoscopic views obtained by the Berman Airway and the Williams Airway were significantly different (p < 0.008, test of symmetry). The estimated odds ratio of obtaining an obstructed path was 3.06 times higher for the Berman than the Williams Airway. However, if the glottis could be reached with the bronchoscope, there was no significant difference in the degree of ease of intubation between the two airways.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Airway Obstruction / complications
  • Anesthesia, General*
  • Anthropometry
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Fiber Optic Technology / instrumentation*
  • Glottis
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / instrumentation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged