Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system

Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00380.x.

Abstract

Conventional pleural cavity drainage after esophagectomy involves one to two large-bore drainage tubes connected to underwater bottles. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a small mobile vacuum drainage system. Out of 173 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, 167 (97%) had the vacuum drain successfully placed at the end of the operation. Of those, use of the vacuum drain was uneventful for 131 until its removal (78%). Air leaks necessitating connection to underwater drainage occurred in 34 patients (20%), but in 26 of them this was only temporary. Overall success was therefore achieved in 157 patients (94%). Median in-situ placement of the vacuum drain was 4 days, and 85% of patients had their drains removed by the seventh postoperative day. The presence of lung adhesions significantly increased the need for underwater drainage. Postoperative outcomes were no different from a historical cohort with conventional underwater drainage. No drain-related complications were reported. The vacuum drain is an alternative to the conventional, large-bore, chest tube system after transthoracic esophagectomy.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Drainage / instrumentation*
  • Drainage / methods
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Safety
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Esophagectomy / adverse effects*
  • Esophagectomy / methods
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pleural Effusion / etiology
  • Pleural Effusion / therapy*
  • Postoperative Care
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Probability
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Thoracotomy / adverse effects
  • Thoracotomy / methods
  • Treatment Outcome