A randomised comparison of side effects and patient inconvenience of two vaginal progesterone formulations used for luteal support in in vitro fertilisation cycles

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 10;111(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00156-8.

Abstract

Objective: To compare side effects and patient inconvenience of two vaginal progesterone (P) formulations for luteal support in in vitro fertilisation cycles.

Study design: Sixty infertile patients at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were randomised to receive either Cyclogest vaginal suppositories 400mg twice daily or Crinone 8% vaginal gel once daily for 14 days as the luteal support. On Day 6 and Day 16 after embryo transfer, they rated side effects and patient inconvenience into four grades: none, mild, moderate and severe by completing a questionnaire.

Results: Perineal irritation was reported by about 20% of patients in each group. Significantly more patients using Cyclogest suppositories graded inconvenience of administration, leaking out and interference with coitus as moderate or severe.

Conclusion: There was no difference in perineal irritation after Cyclogest suppositories or Crinone 8% gel although significantly more patients found inconvenience of administration, leaking out and interference with coitus after Cyclogest.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intravaginal
  • Adult
  • Coitus
  • Embryo Transfer
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro / methods*
  • Humans
  • Irritants / adverse effects
  • Luteal Phase / drug effects*
  • Nausea / chemically induced
  • Perineum
  • Progesterone / administration & dosage*
  • Progesterone / adverse effects*
  • Progesterone / analogs & derivatives*
  • Progesterone / therapeutic use
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Crinone
  • Irritants
  • Progesterone