Bond strengths to endodontically-treated teeth

Am J Dent. 1999 Aug;12(4):177-80.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the bond strengths of three different types of resin bonding systems to teeth prepared for endodontic treatment.

Materials and methods: Access cavity preparation and removal of pulpal tissue were performed in bovine incisors. The root canals were chemically irrigated with saline (control), 5% sodium hypochlorite, 3% hydrogen peroxide, or combinations of both for 60 s. After storage in water for 1 d, the dentin surface was ground to a flat surface with 600-grit SiC under water. The area for bonding was demarcated with a vinyl tape (4 mm-in-diameter hole), and bonded using either Clearfil Liner Bond II, Single Bond, or Superbond C&B. After storage in 37 degrees C water for 1 d, tensile bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. Ten teeth were tested for each group.

Results: One-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test revealed that Single Bond and Superbond C&B had a statistically lower (P < 0.05) bond strengths in the chemical irrigation groups compared with the control group.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / chemistry
  • Boron Compounds / chemistry
  • Cattle
  • Dental Bonding*
  • Dental Pulp Cavity
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents*
  • Hydrogen Peroxide / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Methylmethacrylates / chemistry
  • Resin Cements* / chemistry
  • Root Canal Irrigants* / chemistry
  • Sodium Hypochlorite / chemistry
  • Tensile Strength
  • Tooth, Nonvital*

Substances

  • Boron Compounds
  • Clearfil Liner Bond 2
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Methacrylates
  • Methylmethacrylates
  • Resin Cements
  • Root Canal Irrigants
  • single bond
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
  • Super-bond
  • Hydrogen Peroxide
  • Sodium Hypochlorite