Spinal Muscular Atrophy, X-Linked Infantile
Synonyms: SMAX2, XL-SMA
Lisa Baumbach-Reardon, PhD, FACMG, JM Hunter, PhD, FACMG, Mary Ellen Ahearn, MS, and Miranda Pfautsch, DO candidate.
Author Information and AffiliationsInitial Posting: October 30, 2008; Last Update: July 29, 2021.
Estimated reading time: 17 minutes
Summary
Clinical characteristics.
X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is characterized by congenital hypotonia, areflexia, and evidence of degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells (i.e., lower motor neurons) in the spinal cord and brain stem. Often congenital contractures and/or fractures are present. Intellect is normal. Life span is significantly shortened because of progressive ventilatory insufficiency resulting from chest muscle involvement.
Management.
Treatment of manifestations: Assure adequate caloric intake by caloric supplementation and/or gastrostomy feedings; manage constipation with diet or medication; provide rigorous airway clearance techniques, secretion management, and, ideally, noninvasive ventilatory support, although tracheostomy with permanent mechanical ventilation can be considered; discuss "do not attempt to resuscitate" status with the family before respiratory failure occurs. Orthopedic consultation and physical and occupational therapy to manage contractures and progressive scoliosis. Standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Surveillance: Affected children should be followed at least monthly until the severity and disease course are more clearly delineated. Routine evaluations by a multidisciplinary team, including neurology, pulmonology, orthopedics, physical and occupational therapy, nutrition, and gastroenterology, as needed. Measurement of growth parameters, neurologic evaluation, nutrition/feeding assessment, evaluation of respiratory status, and physical examination for kyphosis/scoliosis at each visit.
Genetic counseling.
By definition, XL-SMA is inherited in an X-linked manner. Heterozygous females have a 50% chance of transmitting the pathogenic variant with each pregnancy. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will usually not be affected. Once the UBA1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, carrier testing for at risk female relatives and prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.
Diagnosis
While suggestive diagnostic criteria were proposed by Dressman et al [2007] as part of inclusion criteria for a research study on this condition, no consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy have been published.
Suggestive Findings
X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy should be suspected in an individual with the following clinical, imaging, electrophysiologic, supportive laboratory, and family history findings.
Clinical features
Congenital hypotonia and areflexia on physical examination
Congenital contractures and/or fractures
Digital contractures at birth. These usually remain throughout the individual's life.
Neuroimaging. Spinal MRI demonstrating evidence of degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells (i.e., lower motor neurons) in the spinal cord and brain stem
Electrophysiology. Electromyogram (EMG) demonstrating denervation
Supportive laboratory findings. Normal SMN1 molecular genetic testing for autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy
Family history. A simplex case involving a male (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) or X-linked pattern of inheritance (e.g., no male-to-male transmission) in families with more than one affected individual is consistent with XL-SMA.
Establishing the Diagnosis
The diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy is established in a male proband with suggestive clinical features and a hemizygous pathogenic variant in UBA1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see ).
Note: Female carriers of XL-SMA are usually unaffected.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive
genomic testing (exome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy is broad, individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders with infantile hypotonia and/or arthrogryposis are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).
Option 1
When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy, molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel:
Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of
UBA1 detects small intragenic deletions/insertions and
missense,
nonsense, and
splice site variants. To date, only missense and synonymous variants in
exon 15 have been identified.
Note: Lack of amplification by
PCR prior to
sequence analysis can suggest a putative (multi)
exon or whole-
gene deletion on the X
chromosome in affected males; confirmation requires additional testing by gene-targeted
deletion/duplication analysis. However, no deletions or duplications involving this gene have been reported as a cause of
X-linked infantile SMA and some studies suggest that deletion of this gene in a male may be embryonic lethal.
A neuromuscular or arthrogryposis multigene panel that includes
UBA1 and other genes of interest (see
Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of
uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying
phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic
sensitivity of the testing used for each
gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this
GeneReview. Of note, given the rarity of
X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy some panels for hypotonia, neuromuscular conditions, and/or arthrogryposis may not include this gene. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused
exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include
sequence analysis,
deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
For an introduction to multigene panels click
here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found
here.
Option 2
When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by hypotonia, comprehensive
genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
Molecular Genetic Testing Used in X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy
View in own window
Gene 1 | Method | Proportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method |
---|
UBA1
| Sequence analysis 3, 4 | 9/9 5 |
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 6 | Unknown 7 |
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.
- 7.
Clinical Characteristics
Clinical Description
Males
X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is characterized by severe hypotonia and areflexia with loss of anterior horn cells in the spinal cord (i.e., lower motor neurons). The disease course is similar to that of the most severe forms of classic autosomal recessive SMA (when supportive care only is given) caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in SMN1: SMA type 0 (SMA0) and SMA type I (SMA1) (see Spinal Muscular Atrophy). In SMA0, prenatal onset of weakness and poor intrauterine movement results in congenital contractures. In SMA1, motor skills regress before age six months in those receiving supportive care only; affected children who do not receive targeted therapies are never able to sit independently.
Neuromuscular. The weakness of XL-SMA is often prenatal in onset, manifest as polyhydramnios and poor movement in utero that results in congenital contractures. (Note: The term "arthrogryposis" is used to describe the presence of multiple congenital contractures of any cause.) Some neonates with XL-SMA are born with fractures that are perhaps related to poor fetal movement and subsequent bone fragility.
The most consistent features of XL-SMA are anterior horn cell disease and contractures (especially digital contractures) with or without fractures.
The weakness in XL-SMA is progressive. Affected infants may achieve some early motor milestones, but the extent varies among families.
Cognitive ability. Observed during an often-limited life span, cognition appears to be normal in those with molecularly confirmed XL-SMA.
Respiratory. The greatest morbidity in XL-SMA may be restrictive lung disease, which is usually in proportion to the child's weakness and can be further complicated by aspiration and infection [Iannaccone 2007].
Gastrointestinal/feeding issues are a frequent problem.
Other features of XL-SMA that are variably present:
Mild micrognathia
Kyphosis
Scoliosis
Cryptorchidism
Prognosis. Children with XL-SMA usually die from respiratory failure by age two years; however, the age at death ranges from the neonatal period to adolescence, the latter representing those exceptional cases in which extensive respiratory and medical support are provided. The two longest living known affected individuals received both mechanical ventilatory support and a gastrostomy tube.
Note: Individuals with a clinical picture consistent with SMA type II or type III have not been tested for pathogenic variants in UBA1; thus, it is not yet known if individuals with milder SMA phenotypes have UBA1 pathogenic variants.
Females
Female carriers of XL-SMA are usually unaffected.
Prevalence
The prevalence of XL-SMA is unknown. To date, 14 multigenerational families with affected family members have been identified throughout North America, Europe, Mexico, and Thailand [Author, personal observation]. This includes the family described by Greenberg et al [1988].
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) caused by mutation of UBA1 includes other disorders associated with spinal muscular atrophy and/or arthrogryposis (see ).
Table 2.
Disorders with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and/or Contractures in the Differential Diagnosis of X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy
View in own window
MOI | Gene | Disorder 1 | Age of Onset | Multiple Contractures 2 | Fractures | Hypotonia | Muscle Weakness | Motor Regression | Absent Tendon Reflexes | Myopathic Facies | Neurogenic Atrophy | Denervation (by EMG) | AHC Loss |
---|
XL |
UBA1
| XL-SMA (topic of this GeneReview; incl for comparison) | Neonatal-infantile | + | + | ± | + | + | + | ± | ± | + | + |
ATP7A
| Occipital horn syndrome (See ATP7A-Related Copper Transport Disorders.) | Neonatal | + 3 | NR | + | + | NR | NR | + | NR | NR | NR |
ZC4H2
| Wieacker-Wolff syndrome (OMIM 314580) | Neonatal | + | NR | + | + | + | + | + | + (Distal) | NR | ± |
AD |
BICD2
| Lower extremity-predominant SMA 2A (OMIM 615290) | Neonatal-infantile | + | NR | + | + | Delayed motor development | + | NR | + | + | + |
Lower extremity-predominant SMA 2B (OMIM 618291) | In utero 4 | + | + | + | + | Delayed motor development | | NR | + | + | ‒ |
TRPV4
| Scapuloperoneal SMA (See Autosomal Dominant TRPV4 Disorders.) | Neonatal | NR | NR | + | + | Delayed motor development | + | + | + | NR | NR |
AR |
ASCC1
| SMA w/congenital bone fractures 2 (OMIM 616867) | Prenatal | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | + | + | + |
CHRND
| See footnote 5. | Neonatal 6 | | | | | | | | | | |
DNM2
| Lethal congenital contracture syndrome 5 (OMIM 615368) | Prenatal | + | NR | + | + | NA | + | NR | + | + | + |
ERBB3
| Lethal congenital contractural syndrome 2 (OMIM 607598) | Neonatal | + | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | Micrognathia | + | NA | + |
EXOSC3
|
EXOSC3 pontocerebellar hypoplasia
| Neonatal 6 | + | NR | + | + | Delayed motor development | NR | NR | + | + | + |
GLE1
| Congenital arthrogryposis w/ anterior horn cell disease (OMIM 611890) | Neonatal | + | NR | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Lethal congenital contracture syndrome 1 7 (OMIM 253310) | Neonatal death | + | + | NA | + | NA | NA | NA | + | NA | + |
IGHMBP2
| SMA w/ respiratory distress type 1 (OMIM 604320) | Early infancy | + | ± | + | + | NR | + | + | NR | + | + |
RARS2
| Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 6 (OMIM 611523) | Neonatal 6 | + | NR | + | NA | ± | + | + | + | NR | NR |
SMN1
|
SMA 0
| Prenatal | + | ± | + | + | ± | + | ± | + | + | + |
SMA 1
| Infancy (<6 mos) | NR | NR | + | ± | NR | + | NR | + | + | + |
TRIP4
| SMA w/congenital bone fractures 1 (OMIM 616866) | Prenatal | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | + | + | + |
TSEN54
| TSEN54 pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2A | Neonatal 6 | + | NR | NR | NR | NR | + | NR | NR | NR | NR |
VRK1
| Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1A (OMIM 607596) | Prenatal-neonatal 6 | + | NR | + | + | + | NR | NR | + | + | + |
- +
= feature that is present in persons with this disorder; ± = feature that may or may not be present in persons with this disorder AD = autosomal dominant; AHC= anterior horn cell loss; AR = autosomal recessive; EMG = electromyogram; MOI = mode of inheritance; NA= not applicable or not available; NR = feature not reported in persons with this disorder; SMA = spinal muscular atrophy: XL = X-linked
- 1.
Following XL-SMA, disorders are ordered alphabetically by gene within inheritance groups.
- 2.
See following Note on arthrogryposis.
- 3.
Hyperextensibility of finger joints is often found, despite reports of limited elbow and knee extensions.
- 4.
Often associated with prenatal death
- 5.
Two boys with clinical findings identical to those associated with XL-SMA were found to have biallelic CHRND pathogenic variants (the mother and father were confirmed to be heterozygous for the CHRND pathogenic variants) [Authors, unpublished data]. See OMIM 100720 for other phenotypes associated with pathogenic variants in CHRND.
- 6.
Most die of respiratory failure in the first year of life. Survivors have failure to thrive and intellectual disability.
- 7.
The highest prevalence is in Finland (OMIM 253310).
Note: Arthrogryposis (defined as multiple congenital contractures in multiple body areas) is etiologically heterogeneous: underlying etiologies include central nervous system causes, neurogenic effects, fetal constraint, and intrauterine vascular disruption (e.g., amyoplasia). Congenital myasthenic syndromes (disorders of the neuromuscular junction) may also present with arthrogryposis. Many genetic disorders are associated with arthrogryposis (see Hall [2021]). Of these disorders, the subset with the greatest phenotypic overlap with XL-SMA are included in .
For a detailed review of X-linked syndromes with arthrogryposis or early contractures, see Hunter et al [2015].
Management
Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis
To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA), the evaluations summarized in (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.
Table 3.
Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy
View in own window
System | Evaluation | Comment |
---|
Neurologic
| Assessment of muscle tone & strength (if possible) | To guide supportive management 1 |
Nutrition/
Feeding
| Gastroenterology, nutrition, feeding team eval 2 | To incl eval of aspiration risk, fatigue during feeding, GERD, & nutritional status Consider eval for gastric tube placement in those w/dysphagia &/or aspiration risk &/or poor oral intake.
|
Respiratory/
Cardiovascular
| Assessment of respiratory rate, work of breathing, presence of paradoxic breathing, chest wall shape, & skin perfusion | |
Baseline pulmonary studies | To determine extent of restrictive airway disease & cough efficiency |
Baseline polysomnogram 2 | To assess for sleep-disordered breathing, nocturnal hypoventilation, & oxygen desaturation |
Skeletal
| Clinical eval for joint contractures & scoliosis | Consider referral to:
|
Miscellaneous/
Other
| Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselor | To incl genetic counseling |
Family support & resources | Assess:
|
GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; PT = physical therapist
- 1.
- 2.
Treatment of Manifestations
Table 4.
Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy
View in own window
Manifestation/ Concern | Treatment | Considerations/Other |
---|
Weak suck →
poor weight
gain
| Placement of a gastrostomy tube & nutritional supplementation 1 |
|
GERD
| Standard treatment | |
Constipation
| Stool softeners, prokinetics, osmotic agents, or laxatives as needed | If diet & ↑ water content are insufficient |
Respiratory insufficiency/
failure
options 2, 3
| Palliative care &/or no respiratory support 4 | May be an option, depending on family preference |
Airway clearance techniques & secretion mgmt 5 | Incl mechanical in-exsufflator in conjunction w/suctioning & chest physiotherapy, esp during acute illness. Use of mechanical in-exsufflation in treatment of children w/neuromuscular diseases (incl those w/XL-SMA) appears to ↓ pulmonary complications.
|
Noninvasive ventilation 5 (e.g., BiPAP) | For hypoventilation as demonstrated by ↓ oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry or by obstructive sleep apnea BiPAP may improve chest wall & lung development, which may ↓ lung infections & pulmonary comorbidity.
|
Tracheostomy w/permanent mechanical ventilation | Ethical considerations re use of invasive ventilation in severely affected infants w/XL-SMA must be addressed. |
Joint
contractures
| PT, OT | |
Consider surgical intervention. | For severe contractures |
Progressive
scoliosis
| Standard surgical intervention per orthopedist | For severe scoliosis |
Family/
Community
| Ensure appropriate social work involvement to connect families w/local resources, respite, & support. | Ongoing assessment of need for palliative care involvement &/or home nursing |
Coordinate care to manage multiple subspecialty appointments, equipment, medications, & supplies. | |
GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy
- 1.
Including higher-calorie feeds and fat supplementation
- 2.
Options should be discussed with the parents/care providers before respiratory failure occurs.
- 3.
The type of respiratory support is dependent on the individual's respiratory status, quality-of-life goals, and reduction in respiratory complications.
- 4.
Discuss "do not attempt to resuscitate" status with the family before respiratory failure occurs. This discussion may begin early but is appropriate when abdominal breathing is present and/or the forced vital capacity is less than 30%.
- 5.
Noninvasive pulmonary intervention should be incorporated into the management of all affected individuals.
Surveillance
Individuals with XL-SMA should be followed regularly by a physician familiar with this condition (e.g., a clinical geneticist). Other subspecialists involved in ongoing care include a neurologist, pulmonologist, orthopedist, physical and occupational therapists, nutritionist, and gastroenterologist as needed.
Affected children should be followed at least monthly until the severity and disease course are more clearly delineated. Affected children frequently die in infancy or early childhood; their clinical status should be followed closely to optimize management, and to assure that the family has a good understanding of the progression and can make informed decisions.
Table 5.
Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy
View in own window
System | Evaluation | Frequency |
---|
Growth
| Measurement of growth parameters | At each visit |
Neurologic
| Neurologic assessment |
Nutrition/
Feeding
| Monitor for symptoms of swallowing dysfunction, incl coughing, choking, &/or recurrent pneumonia. |
Respiratory 1
| Assessment of respiratory status |
Skeletal
| Assessment for kyphosis and/or scoliosis |
- 1.
Referral to a pulmonologist is recommended.
Therapies Under Investigation
Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.
Genetic Counseling
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with
information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them
make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic
risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic
status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or
ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics
professional. —ED.
Mode of Inheritance
By definition, X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is inherited in an X-linked manner.
Risk to Family Members
Parents of a male proband
In a family with more than one affected individual, the mother of an affected male is an
obligate heterozygote. Note: If a woman has more than one affected child and no other affected relatives and if the
UBA1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in her leukocyte DNA, she most likely has
germline mosaicism.
Molecular genetic testing of the mother is recommended to confirm her genetic status and to allow reliable
recurrence risk assessment.
Sibs of a male proband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the mother:
If the mother of the
proband has a
UBA1 pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting it in each pregnancy is 50%. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will usually not be affected.
If the
proband represents a
simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) and if the
UBA1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of the mother, the risk to sibs is unknown but presumed to be low, although greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of maternal
germline mosaicism.
Offspring of a male proband
Males with a severe
phenotype do not generally survive.
Other family members. The proband's maternal aunts may be at risk of being heterozygotes, and the aunts' offspring, depending on their sex, may be at risk of being heterozygotes or of being affected.
Heterozygote (Carrier) Detection
Carrier testing for at risk female relatives requires prior identification of the UBA1 pathogenic variant in the family.
Note: Females who are heterozygous for this X-linked disorder will usually not be affected.
Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing
Once the UBA1 pathogenic variant has been identified in the family, prenatal diagnosis for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing for XL-SMA are possible.
Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.
Resources
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella
support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder
and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other
organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.
Cure SMA
925 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village IL 60007
Phone: 800-886-1762 (toll-free)
Email: familysupport@curesma.org
National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD)
55 Kenosia Avenue
PO Box 1968
Danbury CT 06813-1968
Phone: 800-999-6673 (toll-free); 203-744-0100; 203-797-9590 (TDD)
Fax: 203-798-2291
Email: RN@rarediseases.org; genetic_counselor@rarediseases.org; orphan@rarediseases.org
AMCSI: Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita Support, Inc.
P.O. Box 6291
Spartanburg SC 29304
Phone: 805-55-AMCSI (1-805-552-6274)
Email: bod@amcsupport.org
Compassionate Friends
Supporting Family After a Child Dies
48660 Pontiac Trail #930808
Wixom MI 48393
Phone: 877-969-0010
Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) - USA
Phone: 833-275-6321
National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC)
8201 Corporate Drive
Suite 600
Landover MD 20785
Phone: 800-346-2742 (toll-free); 301-459-5984 (TTY); 301-459-5900
Fax: 301-459-4263
Email: naricinfo@heitechservices.com
Molecular Genetics
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
Table A.
Spinal Muscular Atrophy, X-Linked Infantile: Genes and Databases
View in own window
Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from
HGNC;
chromosome locus from
OMIM;
protein from UniProt.
For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click
here.
Molecular Pathogenesis
UBA1 encodes ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1. The UBA1 enzyme is at the pinnacle of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) ubiquitination cascade, initiating a series of complex and well-regulated steps that is common to all known processes that involve conjugating ubiquitin to itself or other proteins, including the essential function of tagging proteins to be targeted by the 26s proteasome. Protein degradation is as important as synthesis for protein homeostasis, and UBA1 is essential in all living cells from yeast to human. Complete loss of UBA1 is thought to be lethal, as no in vivo models of Uba1 knockout have been successfully created.
Mechanism of disease causation. Unknown; all pathogenic variants reported to date have been either missense variants or synonymous variants contained within exon 15; there is speculation that these variants may affect gene methylation.
Chapter Notes
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the numerous clinicians and families who have supported XL-SMA disease gene discovery efforts through their cooperation throughout the years (especially Dr Louis Elsas), as well as to the laboratories of Drs Alfons Meindl and Eric Hoffman, who share in the XL-SMA disease gene discovery. The senior author is also extremely grateful to Dr Judith Hall for her expert review of this document. This work was supported in the United States by funds from the Dr John T Macdonald Center for Medical Genetics at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Peyton's Pals, the national Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Families of SMA, TGEN, Flinn Foundation of Research Arizona, and the Arizona Biomedical Commission for Research; and in Europe, by the German Ministry for Research and Education grant and FAZIT-Stiftung, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. The authors would like to dedicate this review in memory of four human geneticists who were fundamental to the early days of this research project: Dr Frank Greenberg, Dr Ronald Haun, Dr Emmanuel Shapira, and especially Dr Victor McKusick, who thought every inherited disorder, common or rare, was worth recognition and further investigation.
Author History
Mary Ellen Ahearn, MS (2008-present)
Lisa Baumbach-Reardon, PhD, FACMG (2008-present)
JM Hunter, PhD, FACMG (2021-present)
Miranda Pfautsch (2021-present)
Stephanie J Sacharow, MD; Boston Children's Hospital (2008-2021)
Revision History
29 July 2021 (ma) Comprehensive update posted live
13 September 2012 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
30 October 2008 (me) Review posted live
10 July 2008 (lbr) Original submission
References
Literature Cited
Balak CD, Hunter JM, Ahearn ME, Wiley D, D'urso G, Baumbach-Reardon L. Functional characterizations of rare UBA1 variants in X-linked spinal muscular atrophy.
F1000Res. 2017;6:1636. [
PMC free article: PMC5615770] [
PubMed: 29034082]
Dlamini N, Josifova DJ, Paine SM, Wraige E, Pitt M, Murphy AJ, King A, Buk S, Smith F, Abbs S, Sewry C, Jacques TS, Jungbluth H. Clinical and neuropathological features of X-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) associated with a novel mutation in the UBA1 gene.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:391–8. [
PubMed: 23518311]
Dressman D, Ahearn ME, Yariz KO, Basterrecha H, Martínez F, Palau F, Barmada MM, Clark RD, Meindl A, Wirth B, Hoffman EP, Baumbach-Reardon L. X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy: clinical definition and molecular mapping.
Genet Med. 2007;9:52–60. [
PubMed: 17224690]
Greenberg F, Fenolio KR, Hejtmancik JF, Armstrong D, Willis JK, Shapira E, Huntington HW, Haun RL. X-linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
Am J Dis Child. 1988;142:217–9. [
PubMed: 3341327]
Hall JG. Arthrogryposis. In: Carey JC, Battaglia A, Veskochil D, Cassidy SB, eds. Cassidy and Allanson's Management of Genetic Syndromes. 4 ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2021:75-91.
Hunter JM, Kiefer J, Balak CD, Jooma S, Ahearn ME, Hall JG, Baumbach-Reardon L. Review of X-linked syndromes with arthrogryposis or early contractures – aid to diagnosis and pathway identification.
Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A:931–73. [
PubMed: 25790323]
Iannaccone ST. Modern management of spinal muscular atrophy.
J Child Neurol. 2007;22:974–8. [
PubMed: 17761652]
Jędrzejowska M, Jakubowska-Pietkiewicz E, Kostera-Pruszczyk A. X-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) caused by de novo c.1731C>T substitution in the UBA1 gene.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25:661–6. [
PubMed: 26028276]
Ramser J, Ahearn ME, Lenski C, Yariz K, Hellebrand H, von Rhein M, Clark RD, Schmutzler RK, Lichtner P, Hoffman EP, Meindl A, Baumbach-Reardon L. Rare missense and synonymous variants in UBE1 are associated with X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy.
Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:188–93. [
PMC free article: PMC2253959] [
PubMed: 18179898]
Shaughnessy N, Forman EB, O'Rourke D, Lynch SA, Lynch B. X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) caused by novel c.1681G>A substitution in the UBA1 gene, expanding the phenotype.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2020;30:35–7. [
PubMed: 31932168]
Wang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, Schroth M, Simonds A, Wong B, Aloysius A, Morrison L, Main M, Crawford TO, Trela A., Participants of the International Conference on SMA Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy.
J Child Neurol. 2007;22:1027–49. [
PubMed: 17761659]
Wang XH, Zhang LM, Yang X, Zhou SZ. A pathogenic missense variant (c.1617G>A, p.Met539Ile) in UBA1 causing infantile X-Linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2).
Front Pediatr. 2020;8:64. [
PMC free article: PMC7059435] [
PubMed: 32181232]