U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Committee on Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation: An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program—Phase II; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. STTR: An Assessment of the Small Business Technology Transfer Program. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Jan 13.

Cover of STTR: An Assessment of the Small Business Technology Transfer Program

STTR: An Assessment of the Small Business Technology Transfer Program.

Show details

Appendix JBibliography

  • Acs Z, Audretsch D. “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis.” The American Economic Review. 1988;78(4):678–690.
  • Acs Z, Audretsch D. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
  • Adelstein F. Live Forensics: Diagnosing Your System Without Killing It First. 2006. [July 17, 2014]. http://frank​.notfrank​.com/Papers/CACM06.pdf.
  • Advanced Technology Program. Performance of 50 Completed ATP Projects, Status Report 2. Washington, DC: Advanced Technology Program/National Institute of Standards and Technology/U.S. Department of Commerce; 2001. (National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 950-2).
  • Alic J. “Evaluating Competitiveness at the Office of Technology Assessment,” Technology in Society. 1987;9(1):1–17.
  • Alic JA, Branscomb L, Brooks H, Carter AB, Epstein GL. Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1992.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. R&D Funding Update on NSF in the FY2007.
  • American Psychological Association. “Criteria for Evaluating Treatment Guidelines.” American Psychologist. 2002;57(12):1052–1059. [PubMed: 12617064]
  • Archibald R, Finifter D. “Evaluating the NASA Small Business Innovation Research Program: Preliminary Evidence of a Tradeoff Between Commercialization and Basic Research.” Research Policy. 2003;32:605–619.
  • Archibugi D, Filippetti A, Frenz M. “Economic Crisis and Innovation: Is Destruction Prevailing Over Accumulation?” Research Policy. 2013;42(2):303–314.
  • Arrow K. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1962. pp. 609–625. (“Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention.”).
  • Arrow K. Discrimination in Labor Market. Ashenfelter Orley, Rees Albert, editors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1973. pp. 3–31. (“The theory of discrimination.”).
  • Audretsch DB. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
  • Audretsch DB, Feldman MP. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review. 1996;86(3):630–640.
  • Audretsch DB, Stephan PE. “Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology.” American Economic Review. 1996;86(3):641–642.
  • Audretsch D, Thurik R. Innovation, Industry Evolution, and Employment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
  • Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y. “Matthew: Effect or Fable?” Management Science. 2014;60(1):92–109.
  • Baker A. “Commercialization Support at NSF.” Draft. No date.
  • Baker JAK, Thurber KJ. Developing Computer Systems Requirements. Ithaca, NY: Digital Systems Press; 2011.
  • Barfield C, Schambra W, editors. The Politics of Industrial Policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1986.
  • Baron J. “DoD SBIR/STTR Program Manager.”. Washington, DC: Oct, 1998. (Comments at the Methodology Workshop on the Assessment of Current SBIR Program Initiatives).
  • Barry CB. “New Directions in Research on Venture Capital Finance.” Financial Management. 1994 Autumn;23:3–15.
  • Bator F. “The Anatomy of Market Failure.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1958;72:351–379.
  • Berberich S. “$29.3M Gates Grant Boosts Sanaria.” Washington Business Journal. 2006 December 15;
  • Biemer PP, Lyberg LE. Introduction to Survey Quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
  • Bingham R. Industrial Policy American Style: From Hamilton to HDTV. New York: M.E. Sharpe; 1998.
  • Birch D. “Who Creates Jobs.” The Public Interest. 1981 Fall;65:3–14.
  • Bouchie A. “Increasing Number of Companies Found Ineligible for SBIR Funding,” Nature Biotechnology. 2003;21(10):1121–1122. [PubMed: 14520384]
  • Branscomb LM, Morse KP, Roberts MJ, Boville D. Managing Technical Risk: Understanding Private Sector Decision-Making on Early Stage Technology Based Projects. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce/National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2000.
  • Branscomb LM, Auerswald PE. Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Managers, and Investors Manage Risk in High-Tech Innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
  • Branscomb LM, Auerswald PE. Between Invention and Innovation: An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2002.
  • Branscomb LM, Auerswald PE. “Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States.” The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2003;28(3-4)
  • Branscomb LM, Keller J. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
  • Brav A, Gompers PA. “Myth or Reality?: Long-Run Underperformance of Initial Public Offerings; Evidence from Venture Capital and Nonventure Capital-Backed IPOs.” Journal of Finance. 1997;52:1791–1821.
  • Brodd RJ. “Factors Affecting U.S. Production Decisions: Why Are There No Volume Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturers in the United States?”. Jun, 2005. (ATP Working Paper No. 05-01).
  • Brown G, Turner J. “Reworking the Federal Role in Small Business Research.” Issues in Science and Technology. 1999 Summer;XV(4):51–58.
  • Bush V. Science—the Endless Frontier. U.S. National Science Foundation; Washington, DC: 1946. Republished in 1960 by.
  • Cahill P. National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. (“Fast track: Is it speeding commercialization of Department of Defense Small Business Innovation Research Projects?”).
  • Carden SD, Darragh O. “A Halo for Angel Investors.” The McKinsey Quarterly. 2004;1
  • Caves RE. “Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature. 1998;36(4):1947–1982.
  • Ceulemans S, Kolls JK. “Can the SBIR and STTR Programs Advance Research Goals?” Nature Immunology. 2013;14(3):192–195. [PubMed: 23416667]
  • Christensen C. The Innovator's Dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.
  • Christensen C, Raynor M. Innovator's Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School; 2003.
  • Clinton WJ. Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994.
  • Clinton WJ. The State of Small Business. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994.
  • Coburn C, Bergland D. Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Technology Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle; 1995.
  • Cochrane JH. “The Risk and Return of Venture Capital.” Journal of Financial Economics. 2005;75(1):3–52.
  • Cohen LR, Noll RG. The Technology Pork Barrel. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1991.
  • Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development. Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation/U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
  • Cooper RG. Dawnbreaker, Inc 2005. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. “The Phase III Challenge: Commercialization Assistance Programs 1990-2005.” White paper. 2001. [July 15].
  • Cooper RS. “Purpose and Performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program.” Small Business Economics. 2003;20(2):137–151.
  • Council of Economic Advisers. Supporting Research and Development to Promote Economic Growth: The Federal Government's Role. Washington, DC: Council of Economic Advisors; 1995.
  • Council on Competitiveness. Innovate America: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness; 2005.
  • Crane G, Sohl J. “Imperatives for Venture Success: Entrepreneurs Speak.” The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2004 May;:99–106.
  • Cutler D. Your Money or Your Life. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  • Cycyota CS, Harrison DA. “What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response.” Organizational Research Methods. 2006;9:133–160.
  • Czarnitzki D, Fier A. “Do Innovation Subsidies Crowd out Private Investment? Evidence from the German Service Sector.”. 2002. (ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 02-04).
  • Dalton AB, Collins S, Muñoz E, Razal1 J, Ebron VH, Ferraris J, Coleman J, Kim B, Baughman R. “Super-Tough Carbon-Nanotube Fibres.” Nature. 2003;423(4):703. [PubMed: 12802323]
  • David PA, Hall BH, Tool AA. “Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence.”. Oct, 1999. (NBER Working Paper 7373).
  • Davidsson P. “Methodological Concerns in the Estimation of Job Creation in Different Firm Size Classes.”. Jönköping International Business School; 1996. (Working Paper).
  • Davis SJ, Haltiwanger J, Schuh S. “Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts.” Business Economics. 1994;29(3):113–122.
  • Dawnbreaker, Inc. “The Phase III Challenge: Commercialization Assistance Programs 1990-2005.”. 2005. [July 15]. (White paper).
  • Dertouzos ML. Made in America: The MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989.
  • Dertouzos ML, Lester R, Solow R. Made in America: The MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1989.
  • Dess GG, Beard DW. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly. 1984;29:52–73.
  • Devenow A, Welch I. “Rational Herding in Financial Economics.” European Economic Review. 1996;40(April):603–615.
  • Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Toronto, Ontario: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2000.
  • DoE Opportunity Forum. “Partnering and Investment Opportunities for the Future.”. Tysons Corner, VA: 2005. [October 24-25].
  • Eckstein O. DRI Report on U.S. Manufacturing Industries. New York: McGraw Hill; 1984.
  • Eisinger PK. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United States. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
  • Ernst and Young. “U.S. Venture Capital Investment Increases to 8 percent to $6.96 Billion in First Quarter of 2007.”. 2007. [April 23].
  • Evenson R, Waggoner P, Ruttan P. “Economic Benefits from Research: An Example from Agriculture.” Science. 1979;205(14 September):1101–1107. [PubMed: 17735033]
  • Feenstra D. “Public Support of Innovation in Entrepreneurial Firms.” Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 2014;19(2):135.
  • Feldman MP. The Geography of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1994.
  • Feldman MP. “Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation.” Small Business Economics. 1994;6(5):363–372.
  • Feldman MP. National Research Council. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. (“Assessing the ATP: Halo Effects and Added Value.”).
  • Feldman MP, Kelley MR. Winning an Award from the Advanced Technology Program: Pursuing R&D Strategies in the Public Interest and Benefiting from a Halo Effect. Washington, DC: Advanced Technology Program/National Institute of Standards and Technology/U.S. Department of Commerce; 2001. (NISTIR 6577).
  • Fenn GW, Liang N, Prowse S. The Economics of the Private Equity Market. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; 1995.
  • Financial Times. “Qinetiq set to make its first US acquisition,”. 2004. [September 8].
  • Fischer E, Reuber AR. “Support for Rapid-Growth Firms: A Comparison of the Views of Founders, Government Policymakers, and Private Sector Resource Providers,” Journal of Small Business Management. 2003;41(4):346–365.
  • Flamm K. Creating the Computer. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1988.
  • Flender JO, Morse RS. The Role of New Technical Enterprise in the U.S. Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Development Foundation; 1975.
  • Freear J, Wetzel WE Jr. “Who Bankrolls High-Tech Entrepreneurs?” Journal of Business Venturing. 1990;5:77–89.
  • Freeman C, Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
  • Galbraith JK. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1957.
  • Gallagher S. “Here Come the Inflate-a-Bots: iRobot's AIR Blow Up Bot Prototypes.”. ARS Technica; 2012.
  • Galope RV. “What Types of Start-ups Receive Funding from the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program?: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 2014;9(2):17–28.
  • Geroski PA. “What Do We Know About Entry?” International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1995;13(4):421–440.
  • Geshwiler J, May J, Hudson M. State of Angel Groups. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation; 2006.
  • Gicheva D, Link AN. “The Gender Gap in Federal and Private Support for Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics. 20152015:1–5.
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. “Risk and Reward in Private Equity Investments: The Challenge of Performance Assessment.” Journal of Private Equity. 1977;1:5–12.
  • Gompers PA. “Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital.” Journal of Finance. 1995;50:1461–1489.
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. “The Use of Covenants: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Partnership Agreements.” Journal of Law and Economics. 1996;39:463–498.
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. “Capital Formation and Investment in Venture Markets: A Report to the NBER and the Advanced Technology Program.”. Harvard University; 1998. (Unpublished working paper).
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. “What Drives Venture Capital Fund-Raising?”. Harvard University; 1998. (Unpublished working paper).
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. “An Analysis of Compensation in the U.S. Venture Capital Partnership.” Journal of Financial Economics. 1999;51(1):3–7.
  • Gompers PA, Lerner J. The Venture Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
  • Good ML. Prepared testimony before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space (photocopy, U.S. Department of Commerce). 1995.
  • Goodnight J. “The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Identifying Best Practice.”. Washington, DC: 2003. [May 28]. (Presentation at National Research Council Symposium).
  • Graham OL. Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
  • Greenwald BC, Stiglitz JE, Weiss A. “Information Imperfections in the Capital Market and Macroeconomic Fluctuations.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. 1984;74:194–199.
  • Griliches Z. The Search for R&D Spillovers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.
  • Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJA, editors. Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley; 2002.
  • Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr., Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004.
  • Hall BH. “Investment and Research and Development: Does the Source of Financing Matter?”. Department of Economics/University of California at Berkeley; 1992. (Working Paper No. 92-194).
  • Haltiwanger J, Krizan CJ. Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact. Zoltan Acs J, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1999. (“Small Businesses and Job Creation in the United States: The Role of New and Young Businesses”).
  • Hamberg D. “Invention in the Industrial Research Laboratory.” Journal of Political Economy. 1963 April;:95–115.
  • Hao KY, Jaffe AB. “Effect of Liquidity on Firms' R&D Spending.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 1993;2:275–282.
  • Hebert RF, Link AN. “In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics. 1989;1(1):39–49.
  • Held B, Edison T, Pfleeger SL, Anton P, Clancy J. Evaluation and Recommendations for Improvement of the Department of Defense Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. Arlington, VA: RAND National Defense Research Institute; 2006.
  • Henrekson M, Johansson D. “Competencies and Institutions Fostering High-Growth Firms.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship. 2009;5(1):1–80.
  • Hess J. “Clinical Operations: Accelerating Trials, Allocating Resources and Measuring Performance.” Cutting Edge Information. 2014 [October 12];
  • Himmelberg CP, Petersen BC. “R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 1994;76:38–51.
  • Hong S, Myung S. “Nanotube Electronics: A Flexible Approach to Obility. Nature Nanotechnology. 2007;2(4):207–208. [PubMed: 18654263]
  • Howell S. “DOE SBIR Evaluation: Impact of Small Grants on Subsequent Venture Capital Investment, Patenting, and Achieving Revenue.”. 2015. [June 29]. (Paper presented at the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop on the Economics of Entrepreneurship).
  • Hubbard RG. “Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment.” Journal of Economic Literature. 1998;36:193–225.
  • Huntsman B, Hoban JP Jr. “Investment in New Enterprise: Some Empirical Observations on Risk, Return, and Market Structure.” Financial Management. 1980;9(Summer):44–51.
  • Institute of Medicine. “The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care Quality.” National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(11):1003. [September 16]; [PubMed: 9749483]
  • Jacobs T. “Biotech Follows Dot.com Boom and Bust.” Nature. 2002;20(10):973.
  • Jaffe AB. “Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the Advanced Technology Program.”. Washington, DC: Advanced Technology Program/National Institute of Standards and Technology/U.S. Department of Commerce; 1996.
  • Jaffe AB. “The Importance of ‘Spillovers' in the Policy Mission of the Advanced Technology Program.” Journal of Technology Transfer. 1998 Summer;
  • Jarboe KP, Atkinson RD. “The Case for Technology in the Knowledge Economy: R&D, Economic Growth and the Role of Government.”. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute; 1998.
  • Jewkes J, Sawers D, Stillerman R. The Sources of Invention. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1958.
  • Johnson W. “Delivering Combat Power to the Fleet.” Naval Engineers Journal. 2004 2004 Fall;:3–5.
  • Johnson T, Owens L. “Survey Response Rate Reporting in the Professional Literature.”. Nashville, TN: May, 2003. (Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research).
  • Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R. “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 2004;68(1):94–101.
  • Kauffman Foundation. About the Foundation. 2014. http://www​.kauffman.org/foundation.cfm.
  • Kleinman DL. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1995.
  • Kolosnjaj J, Szwarc H, Moussa F. “Toxicity Studies of Carbon Nanotubes.” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2007;620:181–204. [PubMed: 18217344]
  • Kortum S, Lerner J. “Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?”. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1998. (NBER Working Paper No. 6846).
  • Krugman P. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
  • Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
  • Kurtz A. “The NCI SBIR Program: An Overview of New Funding Opportunities and Strategies for Employing Lean Startup Tools to Drive Success in Your Small Business.”. 2015. [April 20]. (AACR presentation).
  • Lanahan L. “Multilevel Public Funding for Small Business Innovation: A Review of US State SBIR Match Programs.” The Journal of Technology Transfer. 20152015:1–30.
  • Lanahan L, Feldman MP. “Multilevel Innovation Policy Mix: A Closer Look at State Policies that Augment the Federal SBIR Program.” Research Policy. 2015;44(7):1387–1402.
  • Langlois RN, Robertson PL. “Stop Crying over Spilt Knowledge: A Critical Look at the Theory of Spillovers and Technical Change.”; Paper prepared for the MERIT Conference on Innovation, Evolution, and Technology; Maastricht, Netherlands. August 25-27. 1996.
  • Langlois RN. “Knowledge, Consumption, and Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2001;11:77–93.
  • Lebow I. Information Highways and Byways: From the Telegraph to the 21st Century. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering; 1995.
  • Ledford H. “Indirect costs: Keeping the lights on.” Nature. 2014;515(7527):326–9. [PubMed: 25409809]
  • Lerner J. “The Syndication of Venture Capital Investments.” Financial Management. 1994 Autumn;23:16–27.
  • Lerner J. “Venture Capital and the Oversight of Private Firms.” Journal of Finance. 1995;50:301–318.
  • Lerner J. “The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Effects of the SBIR Program.”. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1996. (Working Paper No. 5753).
  • Lerner J. “Angel Financing and Public Policy: An Overview.” Journal of Banking and Finance. 1998;22(6-8):773–784.
  • Lerner J. “The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Effects of the SBIR Program.” Journal of Business. 1999;72(3):285–297.
  • Lerner J. The SBIR Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. (“Public Venture Capital: Rationales and Evaluation.”).
  • Levy DM, Terleckyk N. “Effects of Government R&D on Private R&D Investment and Productivity: A Macroeconomic Analysis.” Bell Journal of Economics. 1983;14:551–561.
  • Liles P. Sustaining the Venture Capital Firm. Cambridge, MA: Management Analysis Center; 1977.
  • Link AN. “Public/Private Partnerships as a Tool to Support Industrial R&D: Experiences in the United States.”. Paris: 1998. (Paper prepared for the working group on Innovation and Technology Policy of the OECD Committee for Science and Technology Policy).
  • Link AN, Rees J. “Firm Size, University Based Research and the Returns to R&D.” Small Business Economics. 1990;2(1):25–32.
  • Link AN, Scott JT. “Assessing the Infrastructural Needs of a Technology-Based Service Sector: A New Approach to Technology Policy Planning.” STI Review. 1998;22:171–207.
  • Link AN, Scott JT. Overcoming Market Failure: A Case Study of the ATP Focused Program on Technologies for the Integration of Manufacturing Applications (TIMA). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Technology; Oct, 1998. (Draft final report submitted to the Advanced Technology Program).
  • Link AN, Scott JT. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1998.
  • Link AN, Scott JT. Evaluating Public Research Institutions: The U.S. Advanced Technology Program's Intramural Research Initiative. London: Routledge; 2005.
  • Link AN, Scott JT. “The Exploitation of Publicly Funded Technology.” The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2012;37(3):375–383.
  • Link AN, Scott JT. “The Small Business Innovation Research Program.” Issues in Science and Technology. 2012;28(4):89–92.
  • Longini P. Pittsburgh Technology Council. TechyVent. 2003. [November 27]. (“Hot Buttons for NSF SBIR Research Funds.”).
  • Malone T. The Microprocessor: A Biography. Hamburg, Germany: Springer Verlag/Telos; 1995.
  • Mankins JC. Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper. Washington, DC: NASA Office of Space Access and Technology. Advanced Concepts Office; 1995.
  • Mann D, Wang Q, Goodson K, Dai H. “Thermal Conductance of an Individual Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Above Room Temperature.” Nano Letters. 2005;6(1):96–100. [PubMed: 16402794]
  • Mansfield E. “How Fast Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics. 1985;34(2)
  • Mansfield E. Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities. 1996. (Unpublished report).
  • Mansfield E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, Wagner S, Beardsley G. “Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1977;91:221–240.
  • Martin Justin. “David Birch.” Fortune Small Business. 2002 [December 1];
  • Mathers E. Scale Finance. 2015. [July 14]. (“Life Science Startups Looking for New Sources of Funding.”).
  • McCraw T. The Politics of Industrial Policy. Barfield C, Schambra W, editors. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1986. (“Mercantilism and the Market: Antecedents of American Industrial Policy.”).
  • Mervis JD. “A $1 Billion ‘Tax' on R&D Funds.” Science. 1996;272:942–944. [PubMed: 8638132]
  • Morgenthaler D. Managing Technical Risk: Understanding Private Sector Decision Making on Early Stage Technology-Based Project. Branscomb LM, Morse KP, Roberts MJ, editors. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2000. (“Assessing Technical Risk,”).
  • Mowery D. “Collaborative R&D: How Effective Is It?” Issues in Science and Technology. 1998 Fall;:37–44.
  • Mowery D, Rosenberg N. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
  • Mowery D, Rosenberg N. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  • Mowery DC. et al. “The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980.” Research Policy. 2001;30(1):99–119.
  • Mowery DC. National Research Council. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. Mowery DC, editor. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. p. 1. (“America's Industrial Resurgence (?): An Overview.”).
  • Murphy LM, Edwards PL. Bridging the Valley of Death—Transitioning from Public to Private Sector Financing. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. May; 2003.
  • Myers S, Stern RL, Rorke ML. A Study of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Lake Forest, IL: Mohawk Research Corporation; 1983.
  • Myers SC, Majluf N. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics. 1984;13:187–221.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Innovation, Diversity, and the SBIR/STTR Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. SBIR/STTR at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. [PubMed: 26583167]
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. SBIR at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration. “Small Business/SBIR: NICMOS Cryocooler—Reactivating a Hubble Instrument.” Aerospace Technology Innovation. 2002;10(4):19–21.
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration. “The NASA SBIR and STTR Programs Participation Guide.”. 2005. http://sbir​.gsfc.nasa​.gov/SBIR/zips/guide.pdf.
  • National Institutes of Health. “Road Map for Medical Research.”. 2003. http://nihroadmap​.nih.gov/
  • National Research Council. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1986.
  • National Research Council. Semiconductor Industry and the National Laboratories: Part of a National Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1987.
  • National Research Council. Mathematical Sciences, Technology, and Economic Competitiveness. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
  • National Research Council. The Government Role in Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
  • National Research Council. Allocating Federal Funds for R&D. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
  • National Research Council. Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High-Technology Industry. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
  • National Research Council. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Third Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
  • National Research Council. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • National Research Council. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • National Research Council. Industry-Laboratory Partnerships: A Review of the Sandia Science and Technology Park Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • National Research Council. New Vistas in Transatlantic Science and Technology Cooperation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  • National Research Council. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  • National Research Council. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • National Research Council. Attracting Science and Mathematics Ph.D.s to Secondary School Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • National Research Council. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • National Research Council. Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. [PubMed: 24967478]
  • National Research Council. A Review of the New Initiatives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • National Research Council. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • National Research Council. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.
  • National Research Council. Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.
  • National Research Council. Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
  • National Research Council. Partnerships for Solid-State Lighting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002.
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. [PubMed: 20669463]
  • National Research Council. Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconductors: Trends, Implications, and Questions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
  • National Research Council. SBIR—Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. [PubMed: 20669465]
  • National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
  • National Research Council. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. [PubMed: 20669424]
  • National Research Council. Deconstructing the Computer. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  • National Research Council. Software, Growth, and the Future of the U.S. Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  • National Research Council. The Telecommunications Challenge: Changing Technologies and Evolving Policies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  • National Research Council. Enhancing Productivity Growth in the Information Age: Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  • National Research Council. India's Changing Innovation System: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities for Cooperation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  • National Research Council. Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  • National Research Council. SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008. [PubMed: 20464767]
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008. [PubMed: 20669429]
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009. [PubMed: 20464767]
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
  • National Research Council. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
  • National Research Council. Revisiting the Department of Defense SBIR Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
  • National Research Council. Venture Capital and the NIH SBIR Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
  • National Research Council. Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
  • National Research Council. Building the 21st Century: U.S.-China Cooperation on Science, Technology, and Innovation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed: 22259820]
  • National Research Council. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed: 22379652]
  • National Research Council. Growing Innovation Clusters for American Prosperity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
  • National Research Council. The Future of Photovoltaics Manufacturing in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
  • National Research Council. Building Hawaii's Innovation Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Building the Arkansas Innovation Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Building the U.S. Battery Industry for Electric-Drive Vehicles: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Clustering for 21st Century Prosperity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  • National Research Council. Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. [PubMed: 22953359]
  • National Research Council. Building the Illinois Innovation Economy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. [PubMed: 24069623]
  • National Research Council. Building the Ohio Innovation Economy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. [PubMed: 24027806]
  • National Research Council. Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
  • National Research Council. Strengthening American Manufacturing: The Role of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership—Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
  • National Research Council. SBIR at the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
  • National Research Council. The Flexible Electronics Opportunity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
  • National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2005. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2005.
  • National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2006.
  • National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2014.
  • National Science Board. Revisiting the STEM Workforce: A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2015.
  • National Science Foundation. 1999 SBIR/STTR Phase I Program Solicitation and Phase II Instruction Guide. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 1999.
  • National Science Foundation. Federal R&D Funding by Budget Function: Fiscal Years 2003-2005 (historical tables). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004. NSF 05-303.
  • National Science Foundation; Office of Industrial Innovation. “SBIR/STTR Phase II Grantee Conference, Book of Abstracts.”. Louisville: Kentucky; 2006. [May 18-20, 2006].
  • National Science Foundation. “Committee of Visitors Reports and Annual Updates.”. http://www​.nsf.gov/eng/general/cov/
  • National Science Foundation. “Emerging Technologies.”. http://www​.nsf.gov/eng/sbir/eo.jsp.
  • National Science Foundation. “Guidance for Reviewers.”. http://www​.eng.nsf.gov/sbir/peer_review​.htm.
  • National Science Foundation. “National Science Foundation at a Glance.”. http://www​.nsf.gov/about.
  • National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation Manual 14. NSF Conflicts of Interest and Standards of Ethical Conduct. http://www​.eng.nsf.gov/sbir/COI_Form.doc.
  • National Science Foundation; Office of Industrial Innovation. “SBIR/STTR Phase II Grantee Conference, Book of Abstracts.”. Louisville: Kentucky; 2006. [May 18-20, 2006].
  • National Science Foundation. “News Items from the Past Year.”. 2006. [April 10]. Press Release.
  • National Science Foundation, Office of Industrial Innovation. Draft Strategic Plan. 2005. [June 2].
  • National Science Foundation, Office of Legislative and Public Affairs. SBIR Success Story from News Tip. Web's “Best Meta-Search Engine.”. 2003. [March 20].
  • Nelson RR. Government and Technological Progress. New York: Pergamon; 1982.
  • Nelson RR. “Institutions Supporting Technical Advances in Industry.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 1986;76(2):188.
  • Nelson RR, editor. National Innovation System: A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  • O'Brien W. “March-in Rights Under the Bayh-Dole Act: The NIH's Paper Tiger?” Seton Hall Law Review. 2013;30:1403. [PubMed: 24308083]
  • Office of Management and Budget. “What Constitutes Strong Evidence of Program Effectiveness.”. 2004. http://www​.whitehouse​.gov/omb/part/2004_program_eval.pdf.
  • Office of the President. U.S. Technology Policy. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President; 1990.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Innovation in Small and Medium Firms. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1982.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Venture Capital in OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 1995.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Small Business Job Creation and Growth: Facts, Obstacles, and Best Practices. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1997.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Toward Best Policy Practice. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 1998.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Handbook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2006. “Evaluation of SME Policies and Programs: Draft OECD Handbook.” (CFE/SME 17).
  • Perko JS, Narin F. “The Transfer of Public Science to Patented Technology: A Case Study in Agricultural Science.” Journal of Technology Transfer. 1997;22(3):65–72.
  • Perret G. A Country Made by War: From the Revolution to Vietnam—The Story of America's Rise to Power. New York: Random House; 1989.
  • Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S. “Carbon Nanotubes Introduced into the Abdominal Cavity of Mice Show Asbestos-Like Pathogenicity in a Pilot Study.” Nature Nanotechnology. 2008;3(7):423. [PubMed: 18654567]
  • Porter Michael E. On Competition. Porter Michael E., editor. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1998. (“Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Government and Institutions.”).
  • Powell WW, Brantley P. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Nohria N, Eccles RG, editors. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1992. pp. 366–394. (“Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning Through Networks?”).
  • Price Waterhouse. Survey of Small High-tech Businesses Shows Federal SBIR Awards Spurring Job Growth, Commercial Sales. Washington, DC: Small Business High Technology Institute; 1985.
  • Reid GC, Smith JA. Risk Appraisal and Venture Capital in High Technology New Ventures. New York: Routledge; 2007.
  • Roberts EB. “Entrepreneurship and Technology.” Research Management. 1968 July;:249–266.
  • Rogelberg S, Spitzmüeller C, Little I, Reeve S. “Understanding Response Behavior to an Online Special Survey Topics Organizational Satisfaction Survey.” Personnel Psychology. 2006;59:903–923.
  • Romer P. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98:71–102.
  • Rosa P, Dawson A. “Gender and the Commercialization of University Science: Academic Founders of Spinout Companies.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2006 July;18(4):341–366.
  • Rosenberg N. “The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices.” Economic Development and Cultural Change. 1969;18:1–24.
  • Rosenbloom R, Spencer W. Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.
  • Roy AS. “Stifling New Cures: The True Cost of Lengthy Clinical Drug Trials.”. Manhattan Institute; Apr, 2012. (FDP Project Report 5).
  • Rubenstein AH. Problems Financing New Research-Based Enterprises in New England. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank; 1958.
  • Ruegg R, Thomas P. Linkages from DoE's Vehicle Technologies R&D in Advanced Energy Storage to Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and Electric Vehicles. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy/Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; 2007.
  • Sahlman WA. “The Structure and Governance of Venture Capital Organizations.” Journal of Financial Economics. 1990;27:473–521.
  • Saxenian A. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
  • Schacht WH. “The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program: Reauthorization efforts,”. Library of Congress; 2008. (Congressional Research Service).
  • Schell JK, Berente N. “Avoiding the Valley of Death: A Cross-Case Analysis of SBIR Innovation Processes.” Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014;2014(1):16828.
  • Scherer FM. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. New York: Rand McNally College Publishing; 1970.
  • Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row; 1950.
  • Scotchmer S. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2004.
  • Scott JT. “Financing and Leveraging Public/Private Partnerships: The Hurdle-Lowering Auction.” STI Review. 1998;23:67–84.
  • Scott JT. “An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program in New England: Fast Track Compared with Non-Fast Track.” National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. 2000
  • Sheehan K. “E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2001;6(2)
  • Siegel D, Waldman D, Link A. “Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2004;21(1-2)
  • Silverman IM, Dawicki-McKenna JM, Frederick DW, Bialas C, Remsberg JR, Yohn NL, Sekulic N, Reitz AB, Gross DM. “Evaluating the Success of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program: Impact on Biotechnology Companies in Pennsylvania.” Technology. 2015;2(1):5.
  • Silverstein SC, Garrison HH, Heinig SJ. “A Few Basic Economic Facts about Research in the Medical and Related Life Sciences.” FASEB. 1995;9:833–840. [PubMed: 7615152]
  • Sohl J. “The Angel Investor Market in 2013: A Return to Seed Investing.” Center for Venture Research. 2014 [April 30];
  • Sohl J, Freear J, Wetzel WE Jr. “Angles on Angels: Financing Technology-Based Ventures—An Historical Perspective.” Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance. 2002;4(4)
  • Solow RS. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957;39:312–320.
  • Specht DC. “Recent SBIR Extension Debate Reveals Venture Capital Influence.” Procurement Law. 2009;45(2009):1.
  • Stam E, Wennberg K. “The Roles of R&D in New Firm Growth.” Small Business Economics. 2009;33:77–89.
  • Stiglitz JE, Weiss A. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Incomplete Information.” American Economic Review. 1981;71:393–409.
  • Stokes DE. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1997.
  • Stowsky J. “Politics and Policy: The Technology Reinvestment Program and the Dilemmas of Dual Use.” Mimeo. University of California; 1996.
  • Tassey G. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books; 1997.
  • Thurber KJ. Big Wave Surfing. Edina, MN: Beaver Pond Press; 2011.
  • Tibbetts R. Equipping Science for the 21st Century. Irvine J, Martin B, Griffiths D, Gathier R, editors. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Press; 1997. (“The Role of Small Firms in Developing and Commercializing New Scientific Instrumentation: Lessons from the U.S. Small Business Innovation Research Program.”).
  • Tirman J. The Militarization of High Technology. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1984.
  • Tyson L, Petrin T, Rogers H. “Promoting Entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe.” Small Business Economics. 1994;6:165–184.
  • University of New Hampshire Center for Venture Research. The Angel Market in 2006. 2007.
  • U.S. Congress. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. SBIR and Commercialization: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Technology and Competitiveness of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, on the Small Business Innovation Research [SBIR] Program. 1992. pp. 356–361. (Testimony of James A. Block, President of Creare, Inc.).
  • U.S. Congress. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The Small Business Research and Development Enhancement Act of 1992. 1992. (House Report (Rept. 102-554) Part I (Committee on Small Business)).
  • U.S. Congress. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy: A Report to Congress by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1998. http://www​.access.gpo​.gov/congress/house​/science/cp105b/science105b.pdf.
  • U.S. Congress. House Committee on Small Business; Subcommittee on Workforce, Empowerment, and Government Programs. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Opening Doors to New Technology. 2005. [November 8]. (Testimony by Joseph Hennessey 109th. Cong., 1st sess.).
  • U.S. Congress. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology; Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation. Hearing on “Small Business Innovation Research Authorization on the 25th Program Anniversary.”. 2007. [April 26]. (Testimony by Robert Schmidt).
  • U.S. Congress. Senate Committee on Small Business. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1999. [August 4, 1999]. (Senate Report 106-330).
  • U.S. Congress; Senate Committee on Small Business. Small Business Research Act of 1981. 1981. (S.R. 194, 97th Congress).
  • U.S. Congress. Senate Committee on Small Business. Strengthening the Participation of Small Businesses in Federal Contracting and Innovation Research Programs. 2006. [July 12]. (Testimony by Michael Squillante 109th. Cong., 2nd sess.).
  • U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Federal Financial Support for High-Technology Industries. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Budget Office; 1985.
  • U.S. Department of Education. “Scientifically-Based Evaluation Methods: Notice of Final Priority.” Federal Register. 2005;70(15):3586–3589.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Protecting Human Subjects: Untrue Statements in Application. 1981. (21 C.F.R. §314.12).
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Critical Path Initiative.”. htttp://www​.fda.gov/oc​/initiatives/criticalpath/
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Small Business Innovation Research Participants Give Program High Marks. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1987.
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Assessment of Small Business Innovation Research Program. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1989.
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Small Business Innovation Research Program Shows Success But Can Be Strengthened. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1992. (RCED–92–32).
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: DoD's Small Business Innovation Research Program. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1997. (RCED–97–122).
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Observations on the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1998. (RCED–98–132).
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Evaluations of Small Business Innovation Research Can Be Strengthened. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1999. (RCED–99–114).
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Research: Evaluations of Small Business Innovation Research Can Be Strengthened. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1999. (T-RCED–99–198).
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. Small Business Innovation Research: Agencies Need to Strengthen Efforts to Improve the Completeness, Consistency, and Accuracy of Awards Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office; 2006. GAO-07-38.
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. Small Business Innovation Research: Information on Awards Made by NIH and DoD in Fiscal years 2001-2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office; 2006. GAO-06-565.
  • U.S. Public Law 106-554. Appendix I–H.R. 5667—Section 108.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. Results of Three-Year Commercialization Study of the SBIR Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1992.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. Small Business Innovation Development Act: Tenth-Year Results. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. An Analysis of the Distribution of SBIR Awards by States, 1983-1996. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration; 1998.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. “Small Business by the Numbers.”. SBA Office of Advocacy; May, 2003.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. “Frequently Asked Questions.”. 2006. http://www​.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration; May. “Small Business by the Numbers.”. SBA Office of Advocacy; 2006.
  • U.S. Small Business Administration. “SBIR Policy Directive.”. 2012. [October 18].
  • Venture Economics. Exiting Venture Capital Investments. Wellesley, MA: Venture -Economics; 1988.
  • Venture Economics. “Special Report: Rose-Colored Asset Class.” Venture Capital Journal. 1996 July;36:32–34.
  • VentureOne. National Venture Capital Association 1996 Annual Report. San Francisco: VentureOne; 1997.
  • Wallsten SJ. “The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Encouraging Technological Innovation and Commercialization in Small Firms.”. Stanford University; 1996. (Unpublished working paper).
  • Wallsten SJ. Investing In Innovation. Branscomb LM, Keller J, editors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998. (“Rethinking the Small Business Innovation Research Program.”).
  • Warner EE. “Factor Analysis of Disruptive Technology Approaches and Company Demographics in Defense SBIR Phase 1 Competition.”. Capella University; 2014. (Ph.D. Dissertation).
  • Washington Technology. “Top 100 Federal Prime Contractors: 2004.”. 2007. [May 14].
  • Weiss S. “The Private Equity Continuum.”. University of California at Riverside; Palm Springs, CA: 2006. [December 8-9]. (Presentation at the Executive Seminar on Angel Funding).
  • Whalen PS, Holloway SS, Parkman ID. Proceedings of the 2008 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 184. (“Navigating the ‘Valley of Death': an Investigation of Which Marketing Competencies Lead Toward Successful Technology Commercialization.”).
  • Yu MF, Lourie O, Dyer MJ, Moloni K, Kelly TF, Ruoff RS. “Strength and Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load.” Science. 2000;287(5453):637–640. [PubMed: 10649994]
Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Bookshelf ID: NBK338711
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (11M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...