U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and para-Aramid Fibrils. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1997. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 68.)

Cover of Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and para-Aramid Fibrils

Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and para-Aramid Fibrils.

Show details

APPENDIX 2

SUMMARY TABLES OF GENETIC AND RELATED EFFECTS

Summary table of genetic and related effects of crystalline silica: tridymite

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower
eukaryotes
PlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
   +1  +1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of crystalline silica: cristobalite

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower
eukaryotes
PlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
    +1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of crystalline silica: quartz

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower eukaryotesPlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
     + −1 −1   +  −  −   +  −1  ?1  +1  −1  +1  +  −1  ?1  ?1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of wollastonite

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower eukaryotesPlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
  −1  +1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of natural zeolites

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
ProkaryotesLower eukaryotesPlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
  +1  +1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of coal dust extracts

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower eukaryotesPlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
?+1+1+1?1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

Summary table of genetic and related effects of para-aramid fibrils

Non-mammalian systemsMammalian systems
Proka-
ryotes
Lower eukaryotesPlantsInsectsIn vitroIn vivo
Animal cellsHuman cellsAnimalsHumans
DGDRGADGCRGCADGSMCATIDGSMCATIDGSMCDLADSMCA
1   −1

A, aneuploidy; C, chromosomal aberrations; D, DNA damage; DL, dominant lethal mutation; G, gene mutation; I, inhibition of intercellular communication; M, micronuclei; R, mitotic recombination and gene conversion; S, sister chromatid exchange; T, cell transformation

In completing the tables, the following symbols indicate the consensus of the Working Group with regard to the results for each end-point:

+

considered to be positive for the specific end-point and level of biological complexity

+1

considered to be positive, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

considered to be negative

−1

considered to be negative, but only one valid study was available to the Working Group

?

considered to be equivocal or inconclusive (e.g. there were contradictory results from different laboratories; there were confounding exposures; the results were equivocal)

©International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997.
Bookshelf ID: NBK410072

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (39M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...