NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Finkelstein J, Knight A, Marinopoulos S, et al. Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 206.)
This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Table 24bOverall grade of the quality of evidence in diabetes mellitus studies addressing intermediate outcomes
| 1 | Protection against risk of bias (relates to study design, study quality, and reporting bias* | High |
| * | Mean Jadad score† | 0.36 |
| 2 | Number of studies | 13 |
| 3 | Did the studies have important inconsistency? | No |
| 4 | Were the studies sparse? | No |
| 5 | Overall grade of evidence | High |
- *
The Jadad scoring method, and rules for converting the numerical score to a rating for protection against risk of bias are described in the Quality Assessment subsection of Chapter 2, Methods.
- †
The rules for assessing the quantity and consistency of a body of evidence, and combining that with the mean Jadad score to produce the overall grade are described in the Grading of the Evidence subsection of Chapter 2.
- Table 24b, Overall grade of the quality of evidence in diabetes mellitus studies...Table 24b, Overall grade of the quality of evidence in diabetes mellitus studies addressing intermediate outcomes - Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...