U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Finkelstein J, Knight A, Marinopoulos S, et al. Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 206.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology

Enabling Patient-Centered Care Through Health Information Technology.

Show details

Table 18aSummary of the impact of health IT applications on clinical outcomes for patients with cancer

Study, YearHealth IT ApplicationIntervention ComparedOutcomes MeasurePositive Impact*
Maslin, 1998215Interactive lifestyle counselingInteractive video disk system vs. usual careMental health score on Short-Form 36 questionnaire0
Anxiety score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale+
McDonald, 200548Communication via emailPatient-specific, one-time email reminder with pain-specific recommendations vs. usual carePain at its worst (range: 0–10)+
Pain on average (range: 0–10)+
Pain interference scale (range: 0–10)+
Best QOL
Severe pain
Severe insomnia+
Severe constipation
Patient-specific, one-time email reminder with pain-specific recommendations vs. email reminder, provider prompts, patient education and clinical nurse specialist outreach vs. usual carePain at its worst (range: 0–10)+
Pain on average (range: 0–10)+
Pain interference scale (range: 0–10)+
Best QOL
Severe pain
Severe insomnia+
Severe constipation
Ruland, 200347mHealth, shared decisionmaking toolsComputerized system for shared decisionmaking for care of cancer symptoms vs. usual careNumber of reported symptoms (0–10)+
Number of reported symptoms (0–15)+
Number of reported symptoms (0–20)+
Number of reported symptoms (0–25)+
Number of reported symptoms (0–30)+
Number of reported symptoms (0–40)0
Number of reported symptoms (0–50)+
Taenzer, 2000216IT-guided self-managementLung cancer patients whose physicians and nurses received quality of life training and patients completed the computerized EORTC QLQ-C30 vs. patients completed a paper-and pencil version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 onlyPhysical functioning
Role functioning
Emotional functioning
Cognitive functioning
Social functioning
Global functioning
Number of functional scales indicating compromised function
Fatigue
Nausea and vomiting+
Pain
Dyspnea
Sleep disturbance
Appetite+
Constipation
Diarrhea+
Financial difficulties+
Number of symptom scales indicating compromised functioning
Number of functional and symptom scales indicating compromised function
Total number of items endorsed+

E-mail: Electronic Mail, EORTC-QLQ: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire, IT: Information Technology, mHealth: Mobile Health, QOL: Quality of Life

*

“+” indicates that the intervention had a positive effect on the outcome in comparison with the control

“−” indicates that the intervention had a negative effect on the outcome in comparison with the control

“0” indicates that the intervention had no effect on the outcome in comparison with the control

EORTC-QLQ: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire

Views

  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (15M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...