NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Headline
There was no evidence of an association between consultant presence in Early Pregnancy Assessment Units and clinical outcomes measured as the proportion of women who were admitted as emergencies.
Abstract
Background:
Early pregnancy complications are common and account for the largest proportion of emergency work in gynaecology. Although early pregnancy assessment units operate in most UK acute hospitals, recent National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidance emphasised the need for more research to identify configurations that provide the optimal balance between cost-effectiveness, clinical effectiveness and service- and patient-centred outcomes [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management. URL: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG154 (accessed 23 March 2016)].
Objectives:
The primary aim was to test the hypothesis that the rate of hospital admissions for early pregnancy complications is lower in early pregnancy assessment units with high consultant presence than in units with low consultant presence. The key secondary objectives were to assess the effect of increased consultant presence on other clinical outcomes, to explore patient satisfaction with the quality of care and to make evidence-based recommendations about the future configuration of UK early pregnancy assessment units.
Design:
The Variations in the organisations of Early Pregnancy Assessment Units in the UK and their effects on clinical, Service and PAtient-centred outcomes (VESPA) study employed a multimethods approach and included a prospective cohort study of women attending early pregnancy assessment units to measure clinical outcomes, an economic evaluation, a patient satisfaction survey, qualitative interviews with service users, an early pregnancy assessment unit staff survey and a hospital emergency care audit.
Setting:
The study was conducted in 44 early pregnancy assessment units across the UK.
Participants:
Participants were pregnant women (aged ≥ 16 years) attending the early pregnancy assessment units or other hospital emergency services because of suspected early pregnancy complications. Staff members directly involved in providing early pregnancy care completed the staff survey.
Main outcome measure:
Emergency hospital admissions as a proportion of women attending the participating early pregnancy assessment units.
Methods:
Data sources – demographic and routine clinical data were collected from all women attending the early pregnancy assessment units. For women who provided consent to complete the questionnaires, clinical data and questionnaires were linked using the women’s study number. Data analysis and results reporting – the relationships between clinical outcomes and consultant presence, unit volume and weekend opening hours were investigated using appropriate regression models. Qualitative interviews with women, and patient and staff satisfaction, health economic and workforce analyses were also undertaken, accounting for consultant presence, unit volume and weekend opening hours.
Results:
We collected clinical data from 6606 women. There was no evidence of an association between admission rate and consultant presence (p = 0.497). Health economic evaluation and workforce analysis data strands indicated that lower-volume units with no consultant presence were associated with lower costs than their alternatives.
Limitations:
The relatively low level of direct consultant involvement could explain the lack of significant impact on quality of care. We were also unable to estimate the potential impact of factors such as scanning practices, level of supervision, quality of ultrasound equipment and clinical care pathway protocols.
Conclusions:
We have shown that consultant presence in the early pregnancy assessment unit has no significant impact on key outcomes, such as the proportion of women admitted to hospital as an emergency, pregnancy of unknown location rates, ratio of new to follow-up visits, negative laparoscopy rate and patient satisfaction. All data strands indicate that low-volume units run by senior or specialist nurses and supported by sonographers and consultants may represent the optimal early pregnancy assessment unit configuration.
Future work:
Our results show that further research is needed to assess the potential impact of enhanced clinical and ultrasound training on the performance of all disciplines working in early pregnancy assessment units.
Trial registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10728897.
Funding:
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Contents
- Plain English summary
- Scientific summary
- Chapter 1. Introduction
- Chapter 2. Methods
- Study design
- National survey of EPAUs
- Recruitment of participating EPAUs
- Data strands
- Eligibility (inclusion and exclusion criteria)
- Participant flow
- Recruitment process
- Data collection
- Data analysis and reporting of results
- Outcomes and assessment
- Definition of end of study
- Withdrawal from study
- Statistical considerations
- Study oversight
- Chapter 3. Results
- EPAU and patient recruitment
- Demographic characteristics of the study population
- Summary of clinical data
- Primary outcome analysis
- Secondary outcomes
- Qualitative interviews
- Clinical care pathways and emotional typologies
- Analysis of women’s experiences of EPAU services
- Recommendations
- Health economic evaluation
- Workforce analysis
- Chapter 4. Discussion
- Chapter 5. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- List of abbreviations
- List of supplementary material
About the Series
Declared competing interests of authors: Peter Brocklehurst reports personal fees from the Medical Research Council (MRC) and AG Biotest (Dreieich, Germany), and grants from the MRC, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme, NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme and Wellcome Trust, outside the submitted work. At the time of the study, Peter Brocklehurst was a chairperson of the NIHR HTA Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health Panel (2014–16) and a member of the NIHR HTA Programme Commissioning Group (2010–12) and the NIHR HTA Prioritisation Group (2014–16). Edna Keeney reports personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd (London, UK) and from Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA), outside the submitted work. Jeff Round is currently employed by the Institute of Health Economics. The Institute of Health Economics receives funding from, and collaborates with, government, academic, not-for-profit and private-sector organisations. The Institute of Health Economics does not currently receive funds for research related to the submitted work.
Article history
The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HS&DR programme or one of its preceding programmes as project number 14/04/41. The contractual start date was in November 2015. The final report began editorial review in April 2019 and was accepted for publication in April 2020. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HS&DR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.
Last reviewed: April 2019; Accepted: April 2020.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Perinatal mental health services in pregnancy and the year after birth: the ESMI research programme including RCT[ 2022]Review Perinatal mental health services in pregnancy and the year after birth: the ESMI research programme including RCTHoward LM, Abel KM, Atmore KH, Bick D, Bye A, Byford S, Carson LE, Dolman C, Heslin M, Hunter M, et al. 2022 Jun
- Evaluating mental health decision units in acute care pathways (DECISION): a quasi-experimental, qualitative and health economic evaluation.[Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023]Evaluating mental health decision units in acute care pathways (DECISION): a quasi-experimental, qualitative and health economic evaluation.Gillard S, Anderson K, Clarke G, Crowe C, Goldsmith L, Jarman H, Johnson S, Lomani J, McDaid D, Pariza P, et al. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Dec; 11(25):1-221.
- Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: Findings from the VESPA Study.[PLoS One. 2021]Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: Findings from the VESPA Study.Memtsa M, Goodhart V, Ambler G, Brocklehurst P, Keeney E, Silverio SA, Anastasiou Z, Round J, Khan N, Hall J, et al. PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0260534. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
- Review Acute day units in non-residential settings for people in mental health crisis: the AD-CARE mixed-methods study[ 2021]Review Acute day units in non-residential settings for people in mental health crisis: the AD-CARE mixed-methods studyOsborn D, Lamb D, Canaway A, Davidson M, Favarato G, Pinfold V, Harper T, Johnson S, Khan H, Kirkbride J, et al. 2021 Sep
- Review Evaluating specialist autism teams’ provision of care and support for autistic adults without learning disabilities: the SHAPE mixed-methods study[ 2020]Review Evaluating specialist autism teams’ provision of care and support for autistic adults without learning disabilities: the SHAPE mixed-methods studyBeresford B, Mukherjee S, Mayhew E, Heavey E, Park AL, Stuttard L, Allgar V, Knapp M. 2020 Dec
- Variations in the organisation of and outcomes from Early Pregnancy Assessment U...Variations in the organisation of and outcomes from Early Pregnancy Assessment Units: the VESPA mixed-methods study
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...