NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Key messages
- Health system resilience is key to coping with catastrophic events, such as the economic crisis and the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, but there is much confusion about what resilience means, how to strengthen it and how to assess it.
- For operational and assessment purposes, and to foster a more consistent understanding and use of the key concepts, we adopt the following definitions of health system resilience and shock:
- –
Health system resilience is the ability to prepare for, manage (absorb, adapt and transform) and learn from shocks.
- –
Shock is a sudden and extreme change which impacts on a health system, and is thus different from the predictable and enduring health system stresses, such as population ageing. A shock cycle has four stages: Stage 1: Preparedness; Stage 2: Shock onset and alert; Stage 3: Shock impact and management; and Stage 4: Recovery and learning.
- Based on the existing literature and emerging evidence from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we identify strategies for enhancing resilience and map them on to the key health systems functions:
- –
Governance: effective and participatory leadership with strong vision and communication; coordination of activities across government and key stakeholders; an organizational learning culture that is responsive to crises; effective information systems and flows; and surveillance enabling timely detection of shocks and their impact.
- –
Financing: ensuring sufficient monetary resources in the system and flexibility to reallocate and inject extra funds; ensuring stability of health system funding through countercyclical health financing mechanisms and reserves; purchasing flexibility and reallocation of funding to meet changing needs; and comprehensive health coverage.
- –
Resources: appropriate level and distribution of human and physical resources; ability to increase capacity to cope with a sudden surge in demand; and motivated and well-supported workforce.
- –
Service delivery: alternative and flexible approaches to deliver care.
- Assessing how each function is placed in terms of the strategies above can allow a country to identify the potential sources of vulnerability and plan for further action (to enhance resilience or the capacity to respond). Resilience can also be assessed after the crisis, providing an evaluation of the handling of the crisis.
- Assessment of health system resilience is crisis- and context-specific. It is important to employ a range of both quantitative and qualitative metrics that allow evaluation of particular aspects of health system resilience in order to provide a meaningful overall assessment.
- Analysing experiences of other countries provides useful lessons for policy-makers implementing resilience-enhancing strategies. It is particularly important to learn in the aftermath of the shock and make the link between recovering from the shock to preparedness for future shocks, which is an area often neglected once the health system returns to post-shock ‘normality’.
Contents
About the Series
Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to:
Publications
WHO Regional Office for Europe
UN City, Marmorvej 51
DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.
This policy brief is one of a new series to meet the needs of policy-makers and health system managers. The aim is to develop key messages to support evidence-informed policy-making and the editors will continue to strengthen the series by working with authors to improve the consideration given to policy options and implementation.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Health systems resilience during COVID-19: Lessons for building back better[ 2021]Review Health systems resilience during COVID-19: Lessons for building back betterSagan A, Webb E, McKee M, Greer SL, Karanikolos M, Williams GA, Cylus J, Richardson E, Waitzberg R, Lessof S, et al. 2021
- Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.[Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023]Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Yeoh K, Wu Y, Chakraborty S, Elhusseiny G, Gondhowiardjo S, Joseph N, Lee AWM, Loong HH, Msadabwe-Chikuni SC, Tan BF, et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr; 35(4):e289-e300. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
- Review Metrics and indicators used to assess health system resilience in response to shocks to health systems in high income countries-A systematic review.[Health Policy. 2022]Review Metrics and indicators used to assess health system resilience in response to shocks to health systems in high income countries-A systematic review.Fleming P, O'Donoghue C, Almirall-Sanchez A, Mockler D, Keegan C, Cylus J, Sagan A, Thomas S. Health Policy. 2022 Dec; 126(12):1195-1205. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
- How resilient is health financing policy in Europe to economic shocks? Evidence from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 global financial crisis.[Health Policy. 2022]How resilient is health financing policy in Europe to economic shocks? Evidence from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 global financial crisis.Thomson S, García-Ramírez JA, Akkazieva B, Habicht T, Cylus J, Evetovits T. Health Policy. 2022 Jan; 126(1):7-15. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
- Review Tuberculosis.[Major Infectious Diseases. 2017]Review Tuberculosis.Bloom BR, Atun R, Cohen T, Dye C, Fraser H, Gomez GB, Knight G, Murray M, Nardell E, Rubin E, et al. Major Infectious Diseases. 2017 Nov 3
- Strengthening health systems resilienceStrengthening health systems resilience
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...