Africa
Considerable data gaps exist in our understanding of the etiology of severe febrile illness in Africa. Few studies investigate more than one or a small group of pathogens, and many countries and some regions lack contemporary studies. Furthermore, standard laboratory-based case definitions are not widely used, and study designs rarely include control groups or other approaches to estimating pathogen-specific attributable fractions.
Reddy, Shaw, and Crump (2010) conducted a systematic review of prospective studies of the etiology of community-acquired bloodstream infection in Africa. Their findings are as follows:
Of 58,296 patients enrolled in 22 eligible studies in 34 locations from 1984 through 2006, 2,051 (13.5 percent) of 15,166 adolescents and adults had nonmalarial bloodstream infections, yielding 2,078 bloodstream isolates.
Of these isolates, 1,019 (49.0 percent) were Enterobacteriaceae, including 878 (42.3 percent) Salmonella enterica, of which 553 (63.0 percent) were Salmonella serovar Typhi, 5 (less than 1.0 percent) Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A, and 291 (33.1 percent) nontyphoidal Salmonella.
Among the Enterobacteriaceae, Salmonella Typhi predominated in North Africa, whereas nontyphoidal Salmonella predominated in East Africa, West and Central Africa, and Southern Africa.
Among the 141 (6.8 percent) non–Salmonella Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli accounted for 77 (54.6 percent), Klebsiella species (spp.) for 24 (17.0 percent), Proteus mirabilis for 17 (12.1 percent), and Shigella spp. for 10 (7.1 percent).
Other Gram-negative organisms caused 341 bloodstream infections (16.4 percent), of which Brucella spp. accounted for 275 (80.6 percent), occurring predominantly in North Africa; Neisseria spp. for 22 (6.5 percent); Acinetobacter spp. for 16 (4.7 percent); and Pseudomonas spp. for 15 (4.3 percent).
Of the 336 (16.2 percent) Gram-positive isolates, Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 198 (58.9 percent), Staphylococcus aureus for 111 (33.0 percent), and other streptococci for 21 (6.3 percent).
Yeasts caused 39 bloodstream infections (1.9 percent of the total), of which
Cryptococcus spp. accounted for 31 (79.5 percent) and
Candida spp. for 5 (12.8 percent).
Histoplasma capsulatum is sometimes isolated from blood culture (
Archibald and others 1998), but urine-antigen testing detects more cases (
Lofgren and others 2012).
Mycobacterial bloodstream infections were found in 173 of the patients tested, of which 166 (96.0 percent) were due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and 2 (1.2 percent) to M. avium complex.
The bacterial zoonoses brucellosis, leptospirosis, Q fever, and rickettsial infections are also important causes of febrile illness in Africa. Brucellosis appears to be particularly common in North Africa (Afifi and others 2005; Jennings and others 2007; Reddy, Shaw, and Crump 2010), but it also occurs in Sub-Saharan Africa (Dean and others 2012). Although not often sought, leptospirosis is a common cause of febrile illness in Africa, identified as the cause of fever in up to 20 percent of inpatients in some studies (Parker and others 2007). Q fever was responsible for 2 percent to 9 percent of febrile hospitalizations according to a systematic review of African inpatient studies (Vanderburg and others 2014). Spotted fever group rickettsioses and, in some locations, typhus group rickettsioses are also common among febrile inpatients (Prabhu and others 2011). Viral infections including influenza (Yazdanbakhsh and Kremsner 2009) and arbovirus infections such as chikungunya, dengue, Rift Valley fever, and others also may occur.
South and South-East Asia
Although a relatively large number of studies have examined the epidemiology of single diseases in Asia—for example, typhoid, scrub typhus, and melioidosis—they cover relatively few sites that are concentrated in South-East Asia (Acestor and others 2012). Vast knowledge gaps persist for China and India, with no studies examining the diversity of pathogens stratified by patient age, outpatient or inpatient status, and disease severity.
Deen and others (2012) identified 17 studies of the etiology of community-acquired bloodstream infection in South and South-East Asia. Among those, pathogenic organisms were isolated from 12 percent of adults. Of adults with bloodstream infections, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi was the most common bacterial pathogen (30 percent). Other commonly isolated organisms in adults were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and other Gram-negative organisms. China was excluded from the review, and no reports were found from peninsular India, representing an enormous gap in knowledge.
In the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal, Blacksell, Sharma, and others (2007) and Murdoch and others (2004) identified the importance of typhoid, dengue, leptospirosis, scrub typhus, and murine typhus. In Papua, Indonesia, Punjabi and others (2012) found among 227 predominantly adult patients hospitalized with negative malaria diagnostic tests that the most common etiological diagnoses were typhoid, leptospirosis, rickettsioses, and dengue.
In a large study of patients ages 7–49 years at three health centers in rural Cambodia, Mueller and others (2014) identified at least one pathogen in 73.3 percent of febrile patients. The most frequent pathogens were the malaria parasites Plasmodium vivax (33.4 percent) and P. falciparum (26.5 percent). Others included pathogenic Leptospira spp. (9.4 percent), influenza viruses (8.9 percent), dengue viruses (6.3 percent), and Orientia tsutsugamushi (3.9 percent). However, in the control group, consisting of nonfebrile persons accompanying febrile patients to health centers, a potential pathogen was identified in 40.4 percent of participants, most commonly malaria parasites and Leptospira spp.
In a similar study, but without a control group, Mayxay and others (2013) investigated the etiology of fever in patients ages 5–49 years presenting at two provincial hospitals in rural northern and southern areas of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. They identified at least one pathogen in 41 percent of patients at diagnosis, most commonly dengue (8 percent), scrub typhus (7 percent), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) (6 percent), leptospirosis (6 percent), and bacteremia (2 percent). Influenza diagnostics were available for one site, where influenza B was the most frequently detected type (87 percent). However, as described in Cambodia (Kasper and others 2010), 50 percent of cases of influenza B would not have been identified by surveillance for influenza-like illness. In rural Lao PDR, the contribution of bacteremia diagnosed by conventional blood cultures was relatively low (2 percent). The etiologies in children and adults were similar, but the data were not stratified by outpatients and inpatients.
With regard to patient management, Mayxay and others (2013) estimated that azithromycin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone, and ofloxacin would have had substantial efficacy for 13 percent, 12 percent, 8 percent, and 2 percent of patients, respectively. They suggested that empiric treatment with doxycycline for patients with undifferentiated fever and negative rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria and dengue could be an appropriate strategy for rural health workers in Lao PDR. Because JEV, usually without encephalitis, was an important cause of fever, JEV vaccination is likely to have a substantial effect on reducing the frequency of patients presenting with fever as well as those developing encephalitis (Mayxay and others 2013).
Despite many data gaps and uncertainties, the evidence highlights the importance of typhoid, dengue, scrub typhus, leptospirosis, and influenza viruses in South and South-East Asia. Relative to Africa, brucellosis and Q fever appear to be less important. Consensus is greatly needed on designing fever studies that emphasize, for example, the inclusion of control groups, especially when sampling sites that are not normally sterile, and standardized reporting. The studies’ variation in inclusion criteria and age stratification make summarizing and comparing data between sites difficult. The lack of reports from China and India is especially troubling because, presumably, most persons in Asia developing fevers live in these two countries.
The lack of an evidence base for development and testing of diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of algorithms of empirical treatment creates much uncertainty for policy makers. A major impediment to better understanding the epidemiology of diverse infections across the continent has been the dearth of quality-assured diagnostic facilities in rural Asia—including the substantial expense and human and technical capacity they would require. The situation suggests that a new model is needed for infectious disease diagnostic facilities in the rural tropics—not one copied from high-income countries (HICs) but a model designed for the local pathogens and environment.