Introduction

Twin births account for just over 3% of live births and 97% of multiple births in the United States. In the absence of assisted reproductive technology, dizygotic twins are much more common than monozygotic twins and account for 70% of all twin gestations.[1] It is imperative to determine as early as possible in the pregnancy both the chorionicity (number of placentas) and anmionicity (number of amniotic sacs) of every twin pregnancy, as this is directly related to the incidence of complications, with monochorionic twin pregnancies.

Whereas the instance of dizygotic twins is variable in different populations, the prevalence of monozygotic twinning is globally constant at 3 to 5 per thousand births.  NEED REFERENCE HERE Except for post-term pregnancy and fetal macrosomia, almost all pregnancy-related risks to both the pregnant patient and the fetuses are exaggerated, accounting for a large percentage of costs to the healthcare system. Guidelines have been established for antenatal surveillance and management of twin pregnancies to improve obstetrical care and decrease perinatal complications.[1]

Etiology

Monoamniotic twin gestations occur when one embryo splits between 9 and 13 days after fertilization. The fetuses thus share both an amniotic sac and a placenta. if the embryo splits after 13 days, conjoined twins may result. this is a rare subtype of monoamniotic twin pregnancy with an incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 pregnancies.[2]

complications occur secondary to doubling placental mass and, thus, the associated obstetric complications of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes. Additionally, the uterus may restrict its capacity to distend and permit adequate fetal growth, thus creating a risk for preterm labor. Fetal growth restriction may also increase the risk for preterm labor and birth due to the increased risk of abnormal placentation and function. In monozygotic gestations, there is an additional unique risk of intraplacental vascular connections between the fetal circulations. Thus, the definition of chronicity in twin gestations is critical to understanding the possible obstetric risks that can develop and formulate an obstetric care plan.[3]

Epidemiology

In pregnancies that are achieved with assisted reproductive techniques, 1.9% are monochorionic and 1/3 of those pregnancies are also monoamniotic.[2]

The primary factor influencing the occurrence of dizygotic twins is the usage of infertility ovulation induction drugs. Almost one-third of all twin infants born in the United States can be attributed to iatrogenic interventions, including medication use, in vitro fertilization (IVF), ovulation induction, and superovulation with intrauterine insemination. IVF also interestingly increases the risk of embryo cleavage that can generate complications of monozygotic twinning. Maternal age is associated with an increased risk for dizygotic twins.[4][5]

There are racial and ethnic population variations in the prevalence of dizygotic twins, with the risk of 1.3 per 1000 births in Japan to 8 per 1000 births in the United States and Europe. The risk uniquely increases in Nigeria, where dizygotic twins comprise up to 50 per 1000 births. With parity, there seems to be an increased risk for dizygotic twins even when adjusted for maternal age. Maternal family history for twinning adds to the risk, but the paternal history is non-contributory. Some studies have suggested those patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 kg/m2 have a high risk for dizygotic twins.[6]

Pathophysiology

In female embryos, the x-chromosome is inactive. Because of this, embryo splitting is delayed, resulting in 2/3 of monoamniotic twins being female.[2]

In twins, the doubling of placental mass explains the increased risk for complications like preeclampsia and gestational diabetes and an increased risk for placenta previa. A higher incidence of velamentous cord insertion may create additional risks for vasa previa.[7] In monochorionic pregnancies, there are other risks of intraplacental vascular connections between the two fetal circulations. This leads to a risk of twin-twin transfusion syndrome and, later during the pregnancy, twin anemia-polycythemia sequence.[8]

On rare occasions, twin reverse arterial perfusion can occur. This condition leads to an abnormal fetus with the pathophysiology of being "parasitic" to the other twin's circulation.[9] Monochorionic, monoamniotic, and twin gestations can also occur if the embryo splits after seven days. Should pathologic embryonic cleavage occur after 14 days, there is a risk for conjoined twins. Another risk unique to monochorionic twin gestations is an unequal placental mass assignment due to the unequal placement of the vascular "equator" and the intervening membrane. The fetus with a smaller placental mass assigned carries a high risk for selective fetal growth restriction.[10]

History and Physical

Interval symphyseal fundal height is routinely evaluated in obstetric prenatal care to screen for fetal growth. In twin gestation, this metric is not a reliable reassurance against fetal growth restriction; however, it still has a clinical role. Symphyseal fundal height is typically 4 cm of the expected gestational age. An unexpected increase may indicate polyhydramnios driven by a diverse range of etiologies. In monochorionic twin gestations, this may indicate twin-twin transfusion syndrome, especially if the mother gives a history of thirst and acutely enlarging abdominal girth.[11]

Weight gain surveillance is a critical part of the physical examination. The Institute of Medicine recommends 25 to 54 pounds (11 to 25 kg) total weight gain at term for women carrying twins. The lower end of this range is suitable for obese women, the middle of the range is appropriate for overweight women, and the upper end of the range is appropriate for women of normal weight.[12] Suboptimal maternal weight gain in twin gestations is associated with an increased risk for fetal growth restriction. A routine obstetric examination also includes evaluating blood pressure and the presence of proteinuria. These measures are also critical to the early diagnosis of preeclampsia, a risk that increases in multiple gestation mothers.

Evaluation

In the first trimester of pregnancy, ultrasound evaluation is imperative to diagnose the chorionicity of the twin pregnancy. With no dividing amniotic membrane between the twins, monoamnionicity is directly diagnosed. Indirect signs may be entangling of the umbilical cords.[2]

Conjoined twins are a bit easier to diagnose because one twin does not move independently of the other. The most common sites for conjoined twins are the thorax or the thorax and abdomen. Roughly 60% of these pregnancies result in stillbirth.[2]

The care plan and evaluation for twin gestations depend on the definition of the chorionicity of the pregnancy.[13] A routine, early imaging policy would allow diagnosis of twin gestations and establish the chronicity reliably; however, the American College Obstetricians and Gynecology do not endorse routine ultrasound examination of the abdomen in fetal low-risk pregnancies. Identifying separate placentas is a highly reliable indicator of dichorionic twins; however, a unified placental appearance may represent a single placenta and a monochorionic twin gestation, although not necessarily so.

Imaging in the first or early second trimester allows evaluation of the intervening gestational membranes in addition to the placental masses. A thin intervening gestational membrane less than 3 mm with the absence of cyst peak sign is indicative of monochorionic twin gestation. As a peak sign, the intervening gestational membrane insertion into the placenta suggests the presence of a chorion between the two amnions. The imaging study is ambiguous regarding the placement of the intravascular "equator" on the placental chorionic plate that demarcates the assignment of the placental mass to each fetus. An unequal placental mass assignment can lead to selective fetal growth restriction. In such scenarios, the growth-restricted fetus may have severe oligohydramnios within the normal fluid in the adjacent sac and be mistaken for a twin-twin transfusion syndrome.[14] When selective fetal growth restriction occurs in conjunction with significant twin-twin transfusion syndrome, the prognosis for twin gestation becomes grim.

Regarding fetal aneuploidy risk assessment, dizygotic twin gestations entail doubling the aneuploidy risk; however, the risk for both affected fetuses is theoretical. For monozygotic twin gestations, the aneuploidy risk is congruent, i.e., either both are affected, or both are healthy; thus, the aneuploidy risks for significant gestation based on maternal age can be utilized. When dichorionic diamniotic twin gestation manifests with gender congruence, a distinction between a monozygotic twin gestation with embryonic splitting in the first three days cannot be excluded; however, the vast majority can be assumed to be dizygotic. Noninvasive prenatal testing for twin gestations is available. Serum screening of NT-sequential and QUAD screening are available. If genetic amniocentesis is pursued, the risk of procedure-related loss is in the range of 3%. Additional technical expertise is required to map the twin gestation before the procedure, especially if they are believed to be dizygotic with the same gender. Discordant results with one affected fetus may indicate a selective fetal reduction, and mapping of the twin gestation at the time with genetic amniocentesis assumes additional relevance.[15]

Obstetric ultrasound evaluations for twin gestations depend on determining the chorionicity of the gestation. An ultrasound at 16 weeks for a fetal anatomy survey is appropriate in dizygotic twin gestations. Subsequently, it should be done every 3 to 4 weeks for fetal growth and confirmation of fetal anatomy.[16] Multiple fetal anatomy evaluations minimize the risk of missing a fetal anomaly and also allow diagnosis of abnormalities that may not present or be available for early diagnosis. Dizygotic twins have an additive risk for congenital anomalies. In monozygotic twins, there is an exaggerated risk for midline anomalies and cardiac anomalies that merit routine fetal echocardiography at 22 weeks. All twin gestations are also at an increased risk for abnormal placentation (placenta previa) and velamentous cord insertions with its attendant risk for vasa previa. Transvaginal scan at 18 weeks with color Doppler mapping allows detection of vasa previa. Intrapartum rupture of the second sac also entails the risk of rupturing an unappreciated gestational vessel; thus, the wisdom for seeking recognition of any pulsation in the membranes before their rupture.[17]

If fetal growth is appropriate, fetal testing is unnecessary unless there are any alternative concerns. In monochorionic twin gestations, imaging every two weeks is recommended and should commence at 16 weeks. The imaging study provides an opportunity for surveillance of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Balanced amniotic fluid and the presence of fetal bladders are reassuring signs. Interval fetal anatomy survey and growth assessment occur with every other study. As long as fetal growth remains reassuring and findings of twin-twin transfusion syndrome are absent, then fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler peak systolic velocity surveillance for twin anemia-polycythemia sequence is deferred to the third trimester when MCA Doppler can be assessed every 3 to 4 weeks for twin anemia-polycythemia sequence risk. Twice-weekly fetal testing is recommended for monochorionic twin gestations beginning at 28 to 32 weeks.[13]

Treatment / Management

Maternal support with adequate nutrition is important and may include supplementation with hematinics.[18] Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a common issue in twin gestations, and prophylactic spine strengthening exercises in the early second trimester can be helpful. Attention to lifestyle and work routine is worthy of review, given the additional physical strain from twin gestation.

Routine obstetric care includes a review every four weeks until 24 weeks and, after that, every two weeks until 32 weeks when weekly evaluations occur. Twin gestations typically conclude around 36 weeks of gestation. Elective delivery in dizygotic twin gestation without complications can be deferred to the 38 to 39-week window. Monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations are best managed expectantly until 34 weeks; after that, delivery becomes an option if there are any significant complications. Typically elective delivery is deferred to the 36 to 37-week window as long as the obstetric course is stable. The mode of delivery depends on prior obstetric history, current obstetric history, as well as fetal presentation. Vaginal delivery is entirely permissible and indeed recommended for cephalic-cephalic presentations and may be considered for cephalic-nonspecific presentations. A breech presentation may indicate an elective cesarean section. Intrapartum obstetric care includes surveillance for dysfunctional labor and risk for postpartum hemorrhage. In the event of premature delivery, appropriate neonatal care should be arranged.[19]

Unique treatment options for complications of monochorionic dichorionic gestation may be necessary, such as laser photoablation of the vascular connections when twin-twin transfusion syndrome occurs.[20] In such scenarios, fetal echocardiography is also warranted to exclude acquired pulmonary stenosis in the donor twin. The occurrence of hydrops fetalis represents an advanced age for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.[21] Delivery may represent the best obstetric intervention as definitive fetal treatment is unavailable after 26 weeks.

In monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation cases, the demise of a single fetus places the surviving fetus at risk of acute hypotension and resultant a 10 to 15% risk for death. Surviving fetuses may show signs of visceral ischemic injury, including porencephalic brain cysts or disruption of the anterior abdominal wall. When a fetal demise occurs, in addition to obstetric challenges, there are additional emotional challenges for the couple, and they deserve supportive care. Fetal treatments are best deferred to tertiary centers. More unusual fetal treatments may include photocoagulation of the umbilical cord to optimize the chances for survival of a single fetus when the survival of both the fetuses is not an achievable obstetric goal (such as twin reversed arterial perfusion). In monochorionic monoamniotic twin gestations, severing of the occluded cord may be preferable if cord entanglement is present.[22]

Differential Diagnosis

• Abdominal tumors complicating pregnancy

• Complicated twin pregnancy

• Hydatidiform mole

• Polyhydramnios

• Single pregnancy

Complications

Due to the larger placental mass and increased uterine contents, twin pregnancies face an elevated risk of developing gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and gestational diabetes. Additionally, individuals carrying twins are more prone to complications such as deep venous thrombosis and stroke.[2]

Fetal anomalies pose a higher risk in monoamniotic twins, reaching levels as elevated as 15-25%, with cardiac anomalies being the most prevalent. It is noteworthy that one or both fetuses may be affected, and in cases where both are impacted, they often exhibit distinct anomalies. The anomalies in monoamniotic twins commonly lack a genetic etiology, as the defects are attributed to the later splitting of the embryo and significant placental anastomosis, which facilitates hemodynamic fluctuations. Merely 4% of anomalies in monoamniotic twins are genetically rooted.[2]

A distinctive complication associated with monochorionic twin pregnancies is acardiac twinning, also referred to as twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence. This condition is notably more prevalent in monoamniotic twins. The presence of reverse flow through arterial-to-arterial anastomoses enables the healthy twin to perfuse the acardiac twin. Complications frequently arise, encompassing preterm birth, cardiac failure, polyhydramnios, and fetal demise of the "pump" twin. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of these pregnancies culminate in the demise of both twins.[2]

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) represents another potential complication in twin pregnancies. In monoamniotic twins, the incidence is approximately 2-4%, typically identified through indicators such as a disproportionately large bladder in one twin and an empty bladder in the other or by Doppler findings. In monochorionic diamniotic twins, the incidence of TTTS increases to 10-15%. For monoamniotic twins with TTTS, the neonatal survival rate is generally low when expectant management is pursued. Attempts to address the condition through laser separation of placental anastomoses have yielded similarly unsatisfactory outcomes. The optimal management strategy for TTTS in monoamniotic twins is still an ongoing challenge that awaits discovery.[2]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Deterrence and patient education play vital roles in managing twin pregnancies effectively. The early identification of risk factors and implementing preventive measures constitute essential components of deterrence. Educating expectant parents about the unique challenges and potential complications associated with twin pregnancies empowers them to make informed decisions regarding prenatal care and lifestyle choices.

Healthcare providers play a crucial role in educating patients about the increased risks of conditions such as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. Emphasizing the importance of regular prenatal check-ups, monitoring fetal development, and adhering to a well-balanced diet can contribute to minimizing potential complications.

Patient education also extends to recognizing signs of complications and understanding the importance of prompt medical attention. Informing patients about the potential for preterm birth and the associated neonatal challenges encourages proactive communication with healthcare providers.

Ultimately, a comprehensive approach that combines deterrence through early intervention and patient education equips both healthcare providers and expectant parents with the knowledge and tools needed to navigate the complexities of twin pregnancies and enhance overall maternal and fetal outcomes.

Pearls and Other Issues

1. Pearls
   • Early Detection and Monitoring: Early identification of twin pregnancies allows for timely and comprehensive prenatal care, facilitating the monitoring of both maternal and fetal well-being.
   • Specialized Care: Twin pregnancies often benefit from specialized care provided by obstetricians along with the added expertise in maternal-fetal medicine. Regular ultrasound assessments and close surveillance are essential.
   • Patient Education: Providing thorough education to expectant parents about the unique challenges and potential complications associated with twin pregnancies enables them to actively participate in their care and make informed decisions.
2. Disposition
   • Individualized Care Plans: Recognizing the inherent variability in twin pregnancies, healthcare providers should develop individualized care plans that consider factors such as chorionicity, gestational age, and maternal health.
   • Collaborative Decision-Making: Engaging in shared decision-making with the patient, considering their values, preferences, and comfort level with various medical interventions.
3. Pitfalls
   • Underestimating Risks: Failing to recognize and appropriately address the increased risks associated with twin pregnancies, such as gestational hypertension, preterm birth, and fetal anomalies.
   • Lack of Interprofessional Communication: Inadequate communication among healthcare professionals can lead to fragmented care, potentially compromising patient outcomes.
4. Prevention
   • Preconception Counseling: Encouraging preconception counseling for individuals contemplating pregnancy, specifically a pregnancy achieved by assisted reproductive technologies, to discuss the incidence of twin pregnancy and the resulting potential risks, to optimize maternal health, and to address any pre-existing medical conditions.
   • Early Prenatal Care: Timely initiation of prenatal care allows for the early detection of complications and the implementation of preventive measures.
   • Lifestyle Modifications: Emphasizing the importance of a healthy lifestyle, including proper nutrition, adequate rest, and avoidance of harmful substances, to minimize the risk of complications.

In summary, the pearls of managing twin pregnancies involve early detection, specialized care, and patient education. The disposition should focus on individualized and collaborative care plans, while pitfalls include underestimating risks and insufficient communication. Prevention strategies encompass preconception counseling, early prenatal care, and lifestyle modifications to optimize outcomes for both the pregnant individual and the twins.

consider deleting this:

Preventing preterm birth, one of the principal complications of twins, needs to be a clinical focus. Unlike women with single pregnancies at risk for preterm birth based on prior obstetric history,  or cerclage for short or shortening cervix, neither the placement of cervical cerclage reduces the risk of preterm labor in twin pregnancies identified to be at exceptional risk based on abbreviated cervical length or prior history of preterm birth. However, vaginal progesterone may be helpful based on preliminary understanding based on limited research data. Women with twin gestation who have preterm birth before 34 weeks may be offered supplemental progesterone for subsequent single pregnancies because preterm labor etiologies unique to plural pregnancy (for example, excessive uterine distention) may not be a principal explanation and, as such, recur in future pregnancies.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The effective management of twin pregnancies requires a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach that leverages the skills, strategy, ethics, responsibilities, interprofessional communication, and care coordination efforts of various healthcare professionals. Effective healthcare delivery demands a collaborative and well-coordinated effort among various healthcare professionals, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other team members. Meticulous documentation of all observations, interactions, and interventions in the case is essential. This comprehensive approach is essential to ensuring patient-centered care and achieving favorable outcomes for both pregnant individuals and their twins.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Hiersch L, Attali E, Melamed N. Special considerations regarding antenatal care and pregnancy complications in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2S):100500. [PubMed: 34637959]

2.

Van Mieghem T, Abbasi N, Shinar S, Keunen J, Seaward G, Windrim R, Ryan G. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2S):100520. [PubMed: 34728404]

3.

Hack KEA, Vereycken MEMS, Torrance HL, Koopman-Esseboom C, Derks JB. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and dichorionic twins after spontaneous and assisted conception: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):717-726. [PMC free article: PMC5969062] [PubMed: 29430623]

4.

Raja EA, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, McLernon DJ. Comparison of perinatal outcomes after frozen or fresh embryo transfer: separate analyses of singleton, twin, and sibling live births from a linked national in vitro fertilization registry. Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):323-334. [PubMed: 35717287]

5.

Davidson L, Canelón SP, Boland MR. Medication-Wide Association Study Using Electronic Health Record Data of Prescription Medication Exposure and Multifetal Pregnancies: Retrospective Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jun 07;10(6):e32229. [PMC free article: PMC9214620] [PubMed: 35671076]

6.

Ezenwa B, Oseni O, Akintan P, Aligwekwe P, Chukwukelu B, Fashola O, Ogunmokun A, Odukoya O. Higher order multiple births in Nigeria: Experiences, challenges and neonatal outcomes in a private health facility. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;20(11):1439-1443. [PubMed: 29303129]

7.

Liu N, Hu Q, Liao H, Wang X, Yu H. Vasa previa: Perinatal outcomes in singleton and multiple pregnancies. Biosci Trends. 2021 May 11;15(2):118-125. [PubMed: 33746156]

8.

Perry H, Duffy JMN, Reed K, Baschat A, Deprest J, Hecher K, Lewi L, Lopriore E, Oepkes D, Khalil A., International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome (CHOOSE). Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. [PubMed: 30520170]

9.

Khanduri S, Chhabra S, Raja A, Bhagat S. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a rare entity. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:9. [PMC free article: PMC4374195] [PubMed: 25861543]

10.

Shao H, Wei Y, Yuan PB, Guo XY, Wang Y, Zhao YY. [Research of placental vascular distribution and clinical outcome in monochorionic twins]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;48(6):411-5. [PubMed: 24103118]

11.

Rouse DJ, Skopec GS, Zlatnik FJ. Fundal height as a predictor of preterm twin delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;81(2):211-4. [PubMed: 8423952]

12.

Gebb JS, Khalek N, Miller K, Hwang R, Paidas Teefey C, Soni S, Tran KM, Moldenhauer JS. Impact of Obesity on Pregnancies Undergoing Laser Therapy for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022;49(7-8):340-346. [PubMed: 35973402]

13.

Bamberg C, Hecher K. Update on twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jul;58:55-65. [PubMed: 30850326]

14.

Wang X, Li L, Yuan P, Zhao Y, Wei Y. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and placental characteristics between selective fetal growth restriction with and without thick arterio-arterial anastomosis in monochorionic diamniotic twins. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 06;22(1):15. [PMC free article: PMC8734322] [PubMed: 34986835]

15.

Chen Y, Yang F, Shang X, Liu S, Li M, Zhong M. A study on non-invasive prenatal screening for the detection of aneuploidy. Ginekol Pol. 2022;93(9):716-720. [PubMed: 35315016]

16.

Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 01;137(6):e145-e162. [PubMed: 34011891]

17.

Duffy CR. Multifetal Gestations and Associated Perinatal Risks. Neoreviews. 2021 Nov;22(11):e734-e746. [PubMed: 34725138]

18.

Corsi DJ, Gaudet LM, El-Chaar D, White RR, Rybak N, Harvey A, Muldoon K, Wen SW, Walker M. Effect of high-dose folic acid supplementation on the prevention of preeclampsia in twin pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):503-508. [PubMed: 32067533]

19.

Brenne Fehn M, Dahlø R, Nielsen R, Laache I, Vanky E. Proactive versus standard support of labour in nulliparous women; study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Apr 23;21(1):358. [PMC free article: PMC7181587] [PubMed: 32326956]

20.

Bautista TN, Krebs TL, Jnah A, Newberry D. Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: A Case Report. Neonatal Netw. 2018 Sep;37(5):292-302. [PubMed: 30567811]

21.

Tolia VN, Hunter Clark R, Perelmuter B, Frankfurt JA, Ahmad KA, Abrams ME, Cohen JL, Clark RH. Hydrops fetalis-trends in associated diagnoses and mortality from 1997-2018. J Perinatol. 2021 Oct;41(10):2537-2543. [PubMed: 34385586]

22.

McDonald SD, Narvey M, Ehman W, Jain V, Cassell K. JOINT SOGC-CPS CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Guideline No. 424: Umbilical cord management in preterm and term infants. Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jul;27(4):254-255. [PMC free article: PMC9291371] [PubMed: 35859680]

Disclosure: Prabhcharan Gill declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Michelle Lende declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: James Van Hook declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.