Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Ensor J, Riley RD, Jowett S, et al.; on behalf of the PIT-STOP collaborative group. Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Feb. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 20.12.)
Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation.
Show detailsTitles and abstracts inclusion/exclusions form
Title and/or abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Include | Exclude | |
Prognostic models | Prognostic models | |
Study design | RCTs | Non-human studies |
Cohort | Commentaries | |
Case–control | Case reports (single case reports) | |
Case series | Study design papers | |
Letters | Non-systematic reviews | |
Systematic reviews (at least one database used) | Cross-sectional | |
Conference abstracts (2005 onwards) | Conference abstracts (pre 2005) | |
Unclear study designs | ||
Modelling keywords | ‘model’ (e.g. prediction model) | No mention of a ‘model’/’rule’/’score’/’prediction’/’index’/’algorithm’, etc. |
‘rule’ | ||
‘score’ (e.g. risk/prediction score) | ||
‘prediction’ | ||
‘index’ | ||
‘algorithm’ | ||
‘risk stratification’ | ||
‘adjustment for’ | ||
‘factors contribution to risk’ | ||
‘adjusted odds ratio/hazard ratio/relative risk’, etc. | ||
Population | Majority of patients aged ≥ 18 years | Patients aged < 18 years |
Patients with a first unprovoked VTE (unprovoked = no history of major surgery; lower limb trauma, e.g. fracture, cast, limping for 3 days; use of the combined OC pill or HRT; pregnancy; significant immobility, e.g. confined to bed for 3 days; cancer) | Patients with a first provoked VTE (provoked = history of major surgery; lower limb trauma, e.g. fracture, cast, limping for 3 days; use of the combined OC pill or HRT; pregnancy; significant immobility, e.g. confined to bed for 3 days; cancer) | |
Patients must have received at least 3 months oral anticoagulation treatment | Patients not treated with OACs, or treated for less than 3 months | |
Mixed populations; only where data extractable for patients meeting above criteria | Healthy individuals, or with conditions other than those described under inclusion criteria (e.g. portal, mesenteric, cerebral vein thrombosis, etc.) | |
Prognostic model | Prognostic models utilising multiple prognostic variables | Does not report prognostic models |
Outcome | Recurrence of VTE | Outcomes other than those mentioned in the inclusion criteria |
Adverse outcomes including mortality and bleeding | ||
Quality of life/cost-effectiveness | ||
Link | Appears to (or could possibly) utilise model to predict risk of VTE recurrence or adverse outcome | Clearly does not link prognostic models to VTE recurrence or adverse outcomes |
Full-text inclusion/exclusion form
Criteria | Yes | C/T | No | Prognostic model |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reviews and discussions | Does the study do more than just discuss a model | |||
Population | Are patients at least 18 years old | |||
Could the population or a defined subpopulation be considered as unprovoked (if not why not) | ||||
Can we identify results specifically for the unprovoked population | ||||
Did patients receive at least 3 months treatment with either a vitamin K antagonist or an OAC | ||||
Outcome | Does the model predict least one of: recurrence/mortality/bleeding/quality of life | |||
Models | Does the model aim to do more than assess a single factor adjusted for other things | |||
Is the model used to predict individuals risk of one of the above outcomes | ||||
Decision | ||||
Exclude with reason | ||||
Does the study include an economic evaluation of a model? | ||||
Comments | ||||
If included | Yes | C/T | No | Factors |
If the study is included, what is their definition of unprovoked? | Major surgery | |||
Lower limb trauma | ||||
Use of OC pill or HRT | ||||
Pregnancy | ||||
Significant immobility | ||||
Cancer | ||||
Thrombophillia (e.g. antiphosphlipid syndrome, factor V leiden, etc.) |
C/T, can’t tell.
Notes
Unprovoked = no history (within 3 months) of major surgery; lower limb trauma, e.g. fracture, cast; use of the combined OC pill or HRT; pregnancy; significant immobility, e.g. confined to bed for 3 days; cancer.
A ‘yes’ in all categories under criteria indicates to include a study, any ‘no’ responses indicate exclusion.
- Inclusion/exclusion forms - Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboem...Inclusion/exclusion forms - Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...