NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, et al. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. (Evidence Syntheses, No. 126.)
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].
Show detailsTable 20Cancer Detection, Recall, and Biopsy Rates of Good-Quality Supplemental Screening Studies
Author, Year USPSTF Quality | Country | Modality | Breast Cancer Detection Rate (95% CI) | Invasive Breast Cancer Detection | Recall Rate | Biopsy Rate* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Berg, 201261 Good | United States | HHUS | 4.4 per 1,000 exams (2.5 to 7.2) | 93.3% (14/15) | 138.8 per 1,000 exams (474/3414) | NR |
Corsetti, 201162 Good | Italy | HHUS | 4.4 per 1,000 exams (3.0 to 6.2) | 87.5% (28/32) | NR | 59.0 per 1,000 exams (427/7224) |
Berg, 201261 Good | United States | MRI | 21.0 per 1,000 exams (8.5 to 42.7) | 85.7% (6/7) | 233.5 per 1,000 exams (78/334) | NR |
Kuhl, 201423 Good | Germany | MRI | 28.6 per 1,000 women (5.9 to 81.2) | 66.7% (2/3) | 85.7 per 1,000 women (9/105) | NR |
Kriege, 200668 Good | Netherlands | MRI | 3.5 per 1,000 exams (2.0 to 9.1) | NR | 109 per 1,000 exams (199/1458) | NR |
- *
Includes needle aspiration, core needle, and open biopsies.
Abbreviations: HHUS=hand-held ultrasound; NR=not reported.
- Table 20, Cancer Detection, Recall, and Biopsy Rates of Good-Quality Supplementa...Table 20, Cancer Detection, Recall, and Biopsy Rates of Good-Quality Supplemental Screening Studies - Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...