NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) conducts human health risk assessments as part of its mission to ensure the protection of workers and public health in the state. The risk assessments identify potential health hazards posed by pesticides, characterize dose-response relationships, and estimate exposure to characterize potential risks to humans. Over the last decade, advances in methods of scientific and technical analysis have led to improvements in the risk-assessment process that have made them more rigorous, transparent, and useful to risk managers. In light of the advances, the California legislature asked DPR to arrange an independent peer review of the agency's risk-assessment practices to ensure that they are scientifically and technically credible.
Review of California's Risk-Assessment Process for Pesticides examines DPR's processes of hazard identification, exposure assessment, dose-response analysis, and risk characterization to determine whether they are consistent with best practices. This report also evaluates the methods used for setting priorities among pesticides for risk assessment and identifies possible options for improving efficiency and productivity. Recommendations of this report will help to make the process more transparent and defensible.
Contents
- THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
- COMMITTEE TO REVIEW CALIFORNIA'S RISK-ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR PESTICIDES
- BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY
- OTHER REPORTS OF THE BOARD ON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND TOXICOLOGY
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Setting Priorities Among Pesticides for Risk Assessment
- 3. Risk-Assessment Practices for Pesticides
- 4. California Data to Inform Priority-Setting and Risk Assessment of Pesticides
- APPENDIXES
- Appendix A Biosketches of the Committee to Review California's Risk-Assessment Process for Pesticides
- Appendix B Department of Pesticide Regulation Risk-Assessment Guidance Documents
- Appendix C Technical Recommendations for Department of Pesticide Regulation Risk Assessments
- Appendix D Pesticide Toxicity Estimates of the Department of Pesticide Regulation and the US Environmental Protection Agency Used to Generate Bottom Histogram of Figure 3-3
This project was supported by Agreement 13-C0026 between the National Academy of Sciences and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment--process and toxicologic pathology.[Toxicol Pathol. 1997]Review Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment--process and toxicologic pathology.Copley MP. Toxicol Pathol. 1997 Jan-Feb; 25(1):68-71.
- Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.[Eur J Health Econ. 2008]Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1:5-29.
- [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008][Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7:S225-46. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
- A survey of California public school districts' ant and weed management practices and a review of their use of IPM.[J Environ Health. 2012]A survey of California public school districts' ant and weed management practices and a review of their use of IPM.Barnes C, Sutherland S, Brattesani M, Wilhoit L, Messenger B. J Environ Health. 2012 Apr; 74(8):18-22.
- Review A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.[Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013]Review A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.Rhomberg LR, Goodman JE, Bailey LA, Prueitt RL, Beck NB, Bevan C, Honeycutt M, Kaminski NE, Paoli G, Pottenger LH, et al. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Oct; 43(9):753-84.
- Review of California's Risk-Assessment Process for PesticidesReview of California's Risk-Assessment Process for Pesticides
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...